IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92881ACD25 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JCOrjf0Rc6Iw for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF5F1ACD3C for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C631036F for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:06:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ape5NgvH_1Wd for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:06:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:9927:30ac:cbc2:99a8]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D26A010370 for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:06:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:06:04 +0200
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnssd@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150722100604.GI4832@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <003b01d0c441$52043470$f60c9d50$@rozanak.com> <20150722083604.GF4832@mx2.yitter.info> <00ac01d0c45b$89f49540$9dddbfc0$@rozanak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00ac01d0c45b$89f49540$9dddbfc0$@rozanak.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/yk-AAm8Gp4wirpT1_G0YREz1EQ8>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:06:12 -0000

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
> 
> This part which says its is not a requirement of SRV records in general. What I understand is that following this structure is not the requirements. They are free to specify their namings

I think you have it backwards.  I believe the text you cite is saying
that DNS-SD is not making normative rules for all SRV records, just
for ones in use for DNS-SD.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email