Re: [Doh] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8484 (6033)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Tue, 31 March 2020 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D683A22B2 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Ctg3ZIbluam for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E5F3A22B0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar05.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.7]) by opfedar24.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48sCSz1kTWz5w4X; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:10:59 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1585667459; bh=I9+8KGAbMdUUXyqmQCiv7f5boeSl2M3WwqNMOdkgRR0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=KzE0mxwwqTvf9rlNE+hrMGZGmFRVc8IaXdgCvbnJBhBvH5BfFuAMt6O/Fhy4BpsLC Ws5S0kHdennOQWbSNkqupQ6c9kGvIGeyan0NXE9qefOsInCS8Fb3xY0sspduZeP8Jw aJAj6cAMSE+5pVMOiqhQgSzhu4xqUf/aLOV8m7q0rXwD5BPb3fWKtvMr74eA5jBQFD oK6QJnVbuQgr9qSmpZTwQ+GwofPjFp+aZkV71gLLIZfcTMk7oEjd10Rw07dAp4PhdJ 6G9+wjh5jjEyhKA/lGDeQYSiLR2gqEo3vGt4q/dCcCEJ92DCo+FmI3CrCIW1SOfma8 9iT7zbq1YbC7w==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.57]) by opfedar05.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48sCSy706sz2xCc; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:10:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
CC: "doh@ietf.org" <doh@ietf.org>, David Lawrence <tale@dd.org>, Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "RFC Editor" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [Doh] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8484 (6033)
Thread-Index: AQHWBrgKy0P/LLB+1UCQ4d22YzaIgqhi3lyAgABgPwD//4t60A==
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:10:57 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031489B69@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20200330155304.45AD8F4074B@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJJ3dAEebgyz==PoSqnhSzFiHcxh0kmynRYBcD6Vjvm+6w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJK-FNqt-uHOz6oqANj8Xpwt7BOQkO6Ut-iAZ_OY-arO5Q@mail.gmail.com> <8FCCBEAC-F86C-4454-BC8A-3E637539BBEB@icann.org> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031489622@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <3BC73714-9E1C-43E1-A76D-F0919C3EA22F@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BC73714-9E1C-43E1-A76D-F0919C3EA22F@icann.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/03dxRByqN0qIPcYLXw0ISTgTFlo>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8484 (6033)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:11:03 -0000

Paul, 

(1)

I went with an errata because I thought the document does not contain any internal inconsistency, but this discussion reveals there is one. While waiting for a document, I do think that at minimum we need a record for this. Tagging this errata as "held for document update" would be appropriate. 

(2)

What about this part of the errata:

* How a different URI can be discovered using server push? Can you please provide a flow example?

   A DoH client MUST NOT use a different URI simply because it was
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   discovered outside of the client's configuration (such as through
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   HTTP/2 server push)
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoffman@icann.org]
> Envoyé : mardi 31 mars 2020 16:48
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN
> Cc : doh@ietf.org; David Lawrence; Ben Schwartz; Patrick McManus;
> Murray S. Kucherawy; Barry Leiba; RFC Editor
> Objet : Re: [Doh] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8484 (6033)
> 
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 2:03 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> > I'm now more puzzled about the intent of the document with regards
> to redirection:
> 
> That's fine, and you are not alone. But the proper resolution of that
> puzzlement is not an erratum, it is a document update.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman