IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [Ext] Privacy Considerations Text (#2)

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Mon, 25 June 2018 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C05F130E82 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bIoc4-mI-OPc for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (www.ducksong.com [192.155.95.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79990130ED0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com (mail-oi0-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AF533A02D for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:14:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e8-v6so12430462oii.2 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3Xw+qtUWr3dfwfGmUBIs/xj1cMKyp6bIJ4HLHo0cJPX+6umrWS k+roBs3DWYMbIuJdU0v8jFwlZ6Kquz8KY2z80Q0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJoWBKExrBvzDItybKO5/zHZ9D5MIO1wGK9frAV4kgedferH0gfbVvqIvPIAka00EpTRILgLGCj4AlPz7Rm2M4=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:e7c8:: with SMTP id e191-v6mr1058004oih.132.1529932487989; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:8a22:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1a87456f-e7c4-e639-69ee-ece7686121b9@o2.pl>
References: <CAOdDvNpGSw6SP6COgJuJR_y2i1BjPWy3_i14vCYUP3jq6=zGuQ@mail.gmail.com> <11f2eb05-cc0f-9540-2f1d-90f510d7561d@o2.pl> <43ADDDC4-B249-4963-8E3C-E2295B4C4529@icann.org> <1a87456f-e7c4-e639-69ee-ece7686121b9@o2.pl>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:14:47 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNqjsL7YWVBbOfCNG5uYobVtbSv3rqKnmozYc2nuok5kNA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNqjsL7YWVBbOfCNG5uYobVtbSv3rqKnmozYc2nuok5kNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a217d056f772ae0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/0BqUbXs_QbnvCWq01pikTknQz70>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Privacy Considerations Text (#2)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:14:53 -0000

It might make sense to mention that TCP correlates different requests
together on the same connection when talking about TCP (though you could
argue this is pretty much just IP correlation).

I don't think we can or should craft a specification recommendation in this
space though. Chartering advice for HTTP has consistently required better
use of long lived connections, clients demand low latency, etc. and there's
no science behind any particular number as it relates to correlation.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email