Re: [Doh] [Ext] Fallback to untrusted DOH servers

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Mon, 23 April 2018 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1165A12D945 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rrzTYQoeFYN4 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58079126B6E for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:05:32 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:05:32 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
CC: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Doh] [Ext] Fallback to untrusted DOH servers
Thread-Index: AQHT1O4btV7cjbCdoU2f7xFlpQyfG6QNRTMAgAAfwgCAATO4AIAAM2sAgAAEdgCAABSvAIAACNUAgABU0oCAAAV1gA==
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:05:31 +0000
Message-ID: <302013A3-DA11-4398-A226-64939FC4DA46@icann.org>
References: <f17cbdf0-cd88-9fa9-c83d-26e2cf13b8c1@o2.pl> <21B4DD30-46B0-4E63-833E-FDE66EF28F95@icann.org> <765e9e5a-9b8c-fa1c-85b5-da824807e609@o2.pl> <CAOdDvNrC6VGQtCYgLOoRvwCGn0kRJuchncFj4m5r_KZ-ig7=NA@mail.gmail.com> <28678acd-f67d-7f95-273f-26ed1115d3ee@o2.pl> <75B0BB57-A222-4328-A155-E5C351DEB7CC@icann.org> <3457562c-5576-18ea-a764-d485d870b5ea@o2.pl> <CAOdDvNqft5RwHcf1Ds-nzCZ=ha1weBTwbP4KzMLoHHwJQt0bVQ@mail.gmail.com> <46145a1e-99a9-405f-9f5c-4b85005feaf9@o2.pl> <BFBE3B13-15DF-45D5-8E8A-A4DC5B476357@icann.org> <CAHbrMsBHV5z5oNJrTvmvAPO79PRSufgGSY_NFePz34xNX4R+vQ@mail.gmail.com> <BF72EBFC-ACFB-49BE-BE7F-5F1AA81E73B0@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF72EBFC-ACFB-49BE-BE7F-5F1AA81E73B0@bangj.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <540DFAC46891AF4A82DB9ED259995AAB@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/0lHSksxhayWnldvA9T6wtFVeMB4>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Fallback to untrusted DOH servers
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:05:36 -0000

On Apr 23, 2018, at 12:45 PM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
> Willem Toorop and I are working on a DHCPv6 draft for discovering DNS-over-TLS, DNS-over-DTLS, DNS-over-DoH. We have been experimenting with different ISC DHCP options to make it as easy to introduce as possible.

1) Why just DHCPv6? DHCPv4 still seems relevant to many of us. :-)

2) Is there a mailing list for "DNS resolver discovery" that this is being discussed on?

--Paul Hoffman