Re: [Doh] [dns-privacy] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 12 March 2019 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E70130DCB; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s7d6DDJmWWrx; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167F9124B91; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 8760F280285; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:01:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7E50A28038C; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:01:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7643E280285; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:01:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1E2663E720; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:01:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6760B40235; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:01:41 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:01:41 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, doh@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, dns-privacy@ietf.org, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Ackermann, Michael" <mackermann@bcbsm.com>
Message-ID: <20190312160141.ibnjtdt5myntwiwk@nic.fr>
References: <1700920918.12557.1552229700654@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <7667c4d7-2e78-0a27-84af-cf1c00fd4897@cs.tcd.ie> <1991054337.12802.1552259263075@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <eea64b30-aad0-a030-5360-1b1484f1d0e3@huitema.net> <CAPsNn2WhjHSEHJUEL8GB6X0d24fkajgPnY4YgkOQbXjyxb5q8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20190312153636.qdsdne24vmi4xdoe@nic.fr> <50BAF399-B95D-438B-B3FC-05A0159439E2@noware.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50BAF399-B95D-438B-B3FC-05A0159439E2@noware.co.uk>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000170, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.3.12.155116
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/0vuCx2maF_vhkm8HIV36ltGlGGg>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:36:43 -0700
Subject: Re: [Doh] [dns-privacy] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:01:50 -0000

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 04:55:11PM +0100,
 Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk> wrote 
 a message of 22 lines which said:

> Actually many enterprises (particularly banks etc.) do not allow DNS resolution directly from employee endpoints.

They block UDP/53, which is not the same thing. Malware or
non-cooperating applications can do name resolution by other means. I
still do not understand why people have a problem with DoH whch did
not already exist before with
my-own-name-resolution-protocol-over-HTTPS.