Re: [Doh] WGLC on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Tue, 01 May 2018 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2204A12EA95 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2018 14:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHTvQlmksjDn for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2018 14:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (www.ducksong.com [192.155.95.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4625D1201FA for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2018 14:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-f172.google.com (mail-ot0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 582D63A05C for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2018 17:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-f172.google.com with SMTP id t1-v6so14279873ott.13 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 May 2018 14:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDvPA3HQtcvuyFbig3VDB2PZRBtBIGOMwsjxDCveNdepp/lPmVK kruBTMKNzBWBc7nvrg6yCHhEKdXH/sSfDwYfNH0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqFIBC57+v2AhLt4Wixe/QfuFUSgT+t/kYulkJZdxJ9t+QLshnhi4ErN4/PTv/ZZB489UuhQj+oT+aNrfWtdOU=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1de4:: with SMTP id w33-v6mr12737085otw.85.1525209461999; Tue, 01 May 2018 14:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.138.36 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2018 14:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F63489DB-568B-4925-A43C-63A897137730@mnot.net>
References: <CAHbrMsAqFfPc00KBjgyk-vW28QMNYndChB-FTSeU9NXfGPMZ-w@mail.gmail.com> <F63489DB-568B-4925-A43C-63A897137730@mnot.net>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 17:17:41 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNqjRYk7gMNqXkxuLUeOh751KCPWN3hHMTyzALL1+e6rGg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNqjRYk7gMNqXkxuLUeOh751KCPWN3hHMTyzALL1+e6rGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000030cec7056b2b80c4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/2Fr2KPejKIalPTcqGREke1SCWhQ>
Subject: Re: [Doh] WGLC on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 21:17:48 -0000

Hey Mark, et al,

For those following just list mail - paul opened a corresponding github
issue https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/165

The essence of your proposal is making this a non-normative SHOULD, but I
think we had established this as something pretty important for the
protocol to operate well. (and I say this not just as an HTTP/2 advocate,
but because the light-bandwidth, high-latency nature of DoH is in
particular need of HTTP/2's multiplexing). However practical considerations
of not being able to control the whole protocol chain create "valid reasons
in particular circumstances" (from 2119) to ignore the requirement.

If you prefer, I would be happy to change to use RECOMMENDED .. when the WG
had this discussion in Singapore we decided to change from MUST to
RECOMMEND (or was it recommend?) instead.





On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Overall, this looks good. One issue:
>
> "The minimum version of HTTP used by DOH SHOULD be HTTP/2 [RFC7540]."
>
> SHOULD is too strong here, and "used by DOH" is ambiguous. Suggest:
>
> "DNS API clients and servers should support, but not require, the use of
> HTTP/2 [RFC7540]."
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
> > On 19 Apr 2018, at 5:07 am, Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> > This message starts a two week WG Last Call on advancing:
> >
> >   Title           : DNS Queries over HTTPS
> >   Author          : Paul Hoffman, Patrick McManus
> >   Filename        : draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-07
> >   Pages           : 17
> >   Date            : 2018-04-11
> >
> > as a Standards Track document. The last call will end on May 2, 2018.
> > All substantive comments are to be sent to the doh@ietf.org list for
> > discussions. Editorial comments can be sent to the document editor.
> >
> > You can find the latest version of the document here:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-07
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ben & tale
> > _______________________________________________
> > Doh mailing list
> > Doh@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>