Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH

Valentin Gosu <valentin.gosu@gmail.com> Wed, 27 March 2019 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <valentin.gosu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092FC120291 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HE1LSePLmsnz for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84B0D120278 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id c4so13542371ioh.9 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5etnqIJwBnydCj2sGSy7GxXeeug1lprkbqjXSgRIRFY=; b=tefI35n9QtQPLseIg5mZvi6YXOqi7yimcYbs2WG3tyoiViIGvYwWtJe/Tkp/jvLJZL Rr8wNSXldX49IbvT9F8eBks3yeraQnyLRFM2/PMpZRpTwOvthpFQxLDKTLQuGnwArbi1 e/mo2RYjR6A+P8WOsE999sDeVp+ivKwSumqz/xsdS4y/yH5PbB/A/jQNl8B360DDzuhS NW1AP4HAUJ8ryhc8C+c0IL+ryx2ck4Jtih0fg2V8RFDiDBzY3U0XhjYLtybb3Iiux9fo 0abSAKzhVfXA8x4+ZN2jodMnGtwBZ4F0NAViGrTyBqbaOkBKpOWG6LvhLAA0GVXo0+ln 6pzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5etnqIJwBnydCj2sGSy7GxXeeug1lprkbqjXSgRIRFY=; b=MaXBm2YAQ9kr15/4gAHoq9FbLwMb2Zbl106wDdkeM0y0CKeB+9iaaEJ7FCahjjztOq 9su77KEFO0rrrFn0Ewy3Q+BxW6TH+mpuQ53ultpKbF21t+NsuK7D/7d4fD2VQoUMn0R9 x4tQyOovIMqS0DJoo6ZvtzJ9wlJ12tPVxYH2XkfLgGIkTRZxmREygOMKYolTWygRi4at lTsyNXB8IssKnfJBtTo5JdBA+W7ASkER4JfQQjdsFR1nGm0F9xT6rrfAaFk+u1pU2eLy dOKXD8XG1rSdKvDvF4hQ+zKp0td1nuccBPYEEnkGJZX3g3vZ6iwPmZn/hNQKnwrTp/80 v9Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUI5JDvShxNgMqnOIUwPezlWXvZzcJsCiPekzr1dGqahxLaTS73 ZcU9tT6pLSaAOrCapfwLBTzgVJiVApQhY65a/LM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxwYstntYQBZZxWCLkIIPOnxdubL2D6jvDiMzTdqhY072Drz6P9Nhm2ipCndDViG7oRMYaQsPnoj5spG8lpNPM=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7e04:: with SMTP id i4mr7470672iom.137.1553682147737; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBOk5bM+3G2Jd3Lu33Z08gc=AeoZ8UFHzN6AYk4f_hjZ8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPUh6x=D+GfKg11+4bRouZdm1LcZvLm1jd4UUEJA832BQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAiTEH_Cpt6ir4vpoAxdVcks+vHqJwcDd7N9DKjV7CC74ON2qQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAiTEH_Cpt6ir4vpoAxdVcks+vHqJwcDd7N9DKjV7CC74ON2qQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valentin Gosu <valentin.gosu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:22:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CACQYfiJh53LniCQYjGfvn0W1q+f4=Ld586Et-+Bn6RwytZSAgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008287c3058510d04d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/2Se-i0FvRk2k7VZ9MVaqO9IONaw>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:22:31 -0000

On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 11:19, Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 10:25, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
>>     1. Copies of Firefox will be configured with a set of TRRs. Different
>>     regions may have different TRR sets or different defaults. In addition
>>     we may have DoH/TRR on by default in some regions and not others,
>>     especially initially.
>>
>
> Can I suggest you pick a default behaviour and stick with it?  This idea
> of having a different default configuration depending on what region the
> user is in (at what point?  at the time they downloaded it?  installed it?
> at runtime? how big is a "region" and how are you determining which one the
> user is in?) is going to be a bit of a support nightmare for IT departments
> with users in different regions.
>
> I'm also curious what your fallback plan is in the event that DoH is
> disabled or unreachable..  One hopes DoT will be tried next, before falling
> back to plan DNS.
>

Firefox uses the system's resolver via getaddrinfo if the DoH server can't
be reached.
If the OS's stub resolver uses DoT, then that's great. Otherwise it's
regular DNS.