[Doh] Seeking input on draft-03

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Thu, 08 February 2018 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A7B12D7E9 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:05:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y65GTuUDoRMA for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:05:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41491242F7 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u12so359350ite.0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:05:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MDLGciv09gVblgmhwbLM3lt4HsSbARyRvsfKpcMyQ3k=; b=r9IfgN+wJuuey0ltr2r51rsDdWuDTfRSReRQOOy33ZQGdHIiBJeL6l4wRE2STBJnNd CJU68VqCGwvG1/BthY/855W1xJlp0a6W16s2FtTjd3J7UWtKEBvLFIixW0+Z45DtBAOn fNhKP5ZXU8yLzu5n01mrZz0ylvyaPJVj1XTSp1WOp9J0hANkxjUNcIOsymhgcsRoVeWe Q386f8GnLBT/2R5ZcZvYjsXNnKT1J4d4eFlUxkjQzvQXsXI+PG6mBeGhKZ9Lj2ubaQfd t6ci72navwrtmtNMMJ5nCb0QWXkLWxahrNCVJE5wdwqNvZSqY+rLE5E5iXSvbpBv+nyy pJ4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MDLGciv09gVblgmhwbLM3lt4HsSbARyRvsfKpcMyQ3k=; b=JcfYqVtD7T3LsizlEtxHS7yA44ydj76u8D55GCuBVd6U1Ht6A7erCCySC2wHJxk/QD ifeG1O74IlFxIyA0qaLic/liwyJrUwN8gLc2m/P0+NxvYY/2UQIp2m3Cf4nP/S1YglHH O6iaUfbSZpBhznRZZbsyKbjOvwXYRGcis4d0w/vQ6AhF2PJN88T+LDFT7eNTnp0ioaUY Akzq0HEGclDByJVDblqXh+YntuRZ8cKQvZsx9zw5cbueSokyuOzLfJ/mDJh+rp8f8q05 rrOsFBo+PVDsa6vys6pkYwF0FJ26SN6zAA9qPWXzxXVZd8QPX9ehUu2VmL1iRw6PsXL0 4uBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPA8ysBPpv+2hlI6yHFyKniNJzudhWXByE5CuE2dZb8/CLlhstty 9TX5XA64Fjan7gPf+yauNLu2QqcSu+3Ze5Ho6cVqDfxHhNo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226wjj8eKbgkgsft3m/yHI7OUJ5aVoBpF5/Zxw6SiQaNePNY2fj6anE6auOXinDXmRLRwV2w96B+ERVSpyGZkVc=
X-Received: by 10.36.26.137 with SMTP id 131mr53915iti.25.1518113120861; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:05:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.164.160 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:05:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:05:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsDwWvtcZy8fpg9gs3o+gc_umi9okJW6rvv+s4T7K9-sVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: doh@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="001a1143ea0a597f160564b74134"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/2lD_DnM15_HhGbiU3Xa1BgOqcFo>
Subject: [Doh] Seeking input on draft-03
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 18:05:25 -0000

Hi all,

The authors of draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https have been making good
progress, and a draft-03 is now ready with several changes and
clarifications.

One important difference is that draft-03 no longer proposes a
".well-known" entry.  In draft-02 and prior, clients could check for the
presence of a DOH service at the default path, given only the domain name
of a server.  In draft-03, there is no default path, so clients must be
configured with the full URL of the DOH endpoint.

Is this change compatible with your use cases?  Would this alter the way
users interact with your systems?  How do you think DOH client
configuration should work?

Please respond with your thoughts,
Ben Schwartz