Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW

Kevin Borgolte <> Fri, 19 July 2019 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BF71205F5 for <>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.594
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DRUGS_ERECTILE=1.994, GB_PHARMACY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=0.1, URI_NOVOWEL=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cLCC8BymJnOx for <>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EEF712013F for <>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id 4so8087276pld.10 for <>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=mail; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=oT1vYbJHA7eaM3O0BJjvf8OIUVUsjSlbeMghXKKbsyM=; b=hS01SjC5qeJ6dNegaphsZZxOikVc4AYjqRuvOVHB+y+aX+xiNq0vdIxQ/H/sL4HDsZ iK3rkgoPyADIBcqyKj45MGx0Q/pUJnwTyNyg69Oqishv4yKLeFQhJU2gqSzGtGeyG9Zy pDEsNU1Xz/XREVe+uxlKFPD/9VxAuSpH3l2LN7jmvwaaRJQJUu4btSt3Zy8newVLVujk D6BuZ3MUaiETBww9UBOJsgs5BZBj6uIzP5IhiRDvrboccxgjXJruuGP0QMpT8UySgwLk MC2DzbYdwRtKqqZmeQch3rw5m8WdDB1rhaRNVUctuUrHEog1cFUXDBta63bzRDy8I/PS +mGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=oT1vYbJHA7eaM3O0BJjvf8OIUVUsjSlbeMghXKKbsyM=; b=g434d3mVKIh2GE1KVI4Gn5ERsy0ovgqzItnD/IIeKifzWEOpC3+QOoretjeGiDDXnH 9sbxEEj+3WSuppuW2Y/E0YYkHFg9n4ywwRn5jMd23fEnh6+sfEI9E69xr/hDGqVfltQo W4c3x8YDzo5l5b+WFfhUoENCUvRkq63QGwZ1w3r8Yghjgkqj56rJ3Ynnk33b2Nz9vWzo zzlZydJwfL42ISVBubmt6NnOS+NmoOiQifPN+jBpN2TX4QBYuk2LZHAVHcVAVheMOcnW TOtvFrAHLhLVn2aLMt3BUAq9FJPzLlwsy560aRU4fmOMT4G+VVp7BYoyaTY8KYCnKqTr gpVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVWUq5PdOFiseg96PFJx8WXRMbl7b69Pp6HaM81+RfsKp8b5aQp Mi5aaE2Yo/iMx8iItcusIBf+EA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDgg/7NhS4samC3BiFT+VQYMw1HCa8v+Px6N/xPcPhWUlsAkyiGrooeXoQvhlFoh1gg0aVJw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4643:: with SMTP id o61mr26881481pld.101.1563514950776; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPSA id m4sm56270283pff.108.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Borgolte <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_62BF672C-84D7-448F-BD03-FB7010D05E14"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:42:26 +0800
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc:, DoH WG <>, dnsop WG <>,,,,,
To: Rob Sayre <>
References: <> <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:42:47 -0000

> This paper looks interesting. Is the software used in the paper published?

Thanks! The code isn’t open source yet, but we will make it public alongside the Docker setup we used for running it. Not sure when that is going to happen exactly though.

> Or, at least, is the test page set published? I haven't read the whole thing yet, but it seems like the page set would be relevant if the paper tests page load time.

The list of websites is attached. It is extracted from the top 1,000 and 99,000 to 100,000 of a Tranco list.