Re: [Doh] Request for the DOH WG to adopt draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Mon, 28 January 2019 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C48130FAF for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:05:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gMMrmaWJtYAV for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (www.haxx.se [IPv6:2a00:1a28:1200:9::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCCEC130FC5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (mail [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id x0S857pS011180 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:05:07 +0100
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x0S8579U011173; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:05:07 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:05:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2112742428.56808.1548254385497@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901232333190.17402@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <8999D6F3-600E-4F1A-903C-10F8CAA6E4F3@icann.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901230812390.17402@tvnag.unkk.fr> <2112742428.56808.1548254385497@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/4jxoVMWegc1D4fZ4IgA8XwyIWIU>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Request for the DOH WG to adopt draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:05:17 -0000

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> This could be true for you and me, but average users have no idea of what 
> the DNS is - they only make one choice, they pick an *ISP* that they decide 
> to trust.

I don't know a single ordinary person who selected their ISP based on their 
privacy stance for DNS queries. The people I know pick ISP primarily based on 
availability, price, bandwidth and technology.

I actually think rather few people trust their ISP, and I think history would 
give them right since so many ISPs have violated their users' privacy and data 
through the years.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se