IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [Ext] panel discussion on DoH/DoC

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450C5130E7F for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:17:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dj2_4NucfT5N for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:17:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1874F130E6C for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:17:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x17HHRrZ066489 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:17:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1549559850; bh=0Hn5MlG8EEEAhoEq/V9S44b+v4ktWR2s/ciH6HfL59U=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Zg73ap6/hK8Mm1s543ztlN+C/S6tC3/E+V0g6ecANCR6qrzMupw/zfaehjJSVvF+Q h+s0U6BIjjjIBzmIcUyMpHeINLKylumxGI+MBTMH4zU4cLW2jx28tatNAbuk8Gbkw/ FkRqqEev/OJsyFSvPR48JEsTbxO8WDg98adIKg6w=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
References: <20190207105106.GB1772@server.ds9a.nl> <C7C3BAF7-4BD4-4EE2-B3F2-1F8B49222980@fugue.com> <20190207130313.7g7hf4swaopnr75e@nic.fr> <FD7BFAFF-88B9-49BF-A652-3649ADCD53F9@fugue.com> <7A2202F4-FAE9-4282-BC0B-8229A9A6E016@icann.org> <A0823A81-BE76-45F4-B5FF-0ADD82352922@cisco.com> <2073b35e-1383-bae1-b80e-3f3a0db6031f@nostrum.com> <FEA4458B-3B11-4BD3-91DC-F5A4A4B27691@cisco.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <9f86d7ca-8edc-8069-774b-0fe36f102838@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:17:21 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FEA4458B-3B11-4BD3-91DC-F5A4A4B27691@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/50vSDR8cBzE9yG1ZMHBOHpCNb_Y>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] panel discussion on DoH/DoC
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 17:17:37 -0000

On 2/7/19 11:00 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Again, researchy stuff.  Which leads me to another question- if DoH 
> has mostly finished in the IETF, maybe this becomes more of a topic 
> for the IRTF?

You're talking largely about user interface issues. I'd be extremely 
wary of throwing that into a forum populated primarily by engineers. 
I've learned enough about UI to appreciate that it's a wildly different 
discipline than engineering, and that there's not much hope of quickly 
training engineers on an excruciatingly complex topic that people have 
made multi-decade careers out of.


On 2/7/19 10:58 AM, bert hubert wrote:
> I just enabled DoH to Cloudflare with a single click in Firefox.
>
> I did not get any warning or explanation what this would mean. It had a
> prefilled entry for Cloudflare that I can't even change from the UI.

As above, I don't think the I{E,R}TF is the correct forum to debate 
specific UI decisions.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email