Re: [Doh] [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 12 March 2019 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF6C131128; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQgpBuitq4TQ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43289131154; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13B2E242109D; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190312154913.4ch2bn6jyu53tfhl@nic.fr>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:02:08 +0000
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, dns-privacy@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2BA35B39-D6D7-43AD-A868-E59E4AD5F237@rfc1035.com>
References: <1700920918.12557.1552229700654@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <7667c4d7-2e78-0a27-84af-cf1c00fd4897@cs.tcd.ie> <1991054337.12802.1552259263075@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <eea64b30-aad0-a030-5360-1b1484f1d0e3@huitema.net> <CAPsNn2WhjHSEHJUEL8GB6X0d24fkajgPnY4YgkOQbXjyxb5q8Q@mail.gmail.com> <e62efaf3-4a35-4a52-5ed4-dee2e7fafe72@huitema.net> <69f989ba-0939-b917-b586-9e3af3fb8b74@redbarn.org> <092c081b-50b2-0c37-7a06-a3bd16c9ccdb@huitema.net> <3e91ec1f-f2d5-a3f1-a40c-5039d24f49b9@redbarn.org> <20190312154913.4ch2bn6jyu53tfhl@nic.fr>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/5Cjgq2obN4BD1qkmMqSHnEFQOMM>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:02:25 -0000


> On 12 Mar 2019, at 15:49, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> the case of a commercial
> Internet access provider is clear in the other direction: a client is
> not an employee, and is entitled to a free, open and neutral Internet
> access.

Stephane, that’s simply not true. A client of an Internet access provider is entitled to the service that they contractually agreed to pay for. Check the small print. Or the T&Cs the next time you use some coffeeshop’s wifi. Even if your ISP offers you “free, open and neutral Internet access” (for some definition of that phrase), I’m pretty sure they’ll drop your service if you were damaging their network or or doing something else that was illegal or otherwise in breach of their T&Cs.