IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Doh] New version: draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh-03.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Sun, 24 March 2019 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCCA127980 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 01:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6z1ANOyONT-k for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 01:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017F2127979 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 01:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 01:20:22 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 01:20:22 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New version: draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHU4hptKMSagvBEkUuc0O0xN2knaA==
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 08:20:22 +0000
Message-ID: <55AE7511-5BDF-4E96-84B3-BD0B6E6C6FE3@icann.org>
References: <155341529409.18062.10657099011172813446@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155341529409.18062.10657099011172813446@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <720868E8BBBF624FA2EE7BC4D9B3AF36@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/5hsGjtPjW7gFQZOFZ8bGZJ1PMyA>
Subject: [Doh] New version: draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh-03.txt
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 08:20:26 -0000

The diffs here are what I think have general agreement from the discussion about this draft so far, but I may have missed things. Comments are still quite welcome.

As for the late discussion of using the URI RRtype instead of TXT, I would not know what to put in the "priority" and "weight" values. That alone seems enough reason to leave this as a TXT record, but others might disagree. It's not a lot of effort to change the text to the URI RRtype, but I don't want to do so unless it is actually better than TXT.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email