IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [Ext] Does the HTTP freshness lifetime need to match the TTL?

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 02 May 2018 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898FA12DA4A for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2018 15:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rfQamf-levmg for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2018 15:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9BC212DA49 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2018 15:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Wed, 2 May 2018 15:23:36 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Wed, 2 May 2018 15:23:36 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Doh] Does the HTTP freshness lifetime need to match the TTL?
Thread-Index: AQHT4mQ2oIkpK1chOkms/JhO5B5Qeg==
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 22:23:36 +0000
Message-ID: <3E34581E-E2DC-48B7-A4AD-6B9FDA418179@icann.org>
References: <15A1809C-2CA3-4A3B-A5B1-279227C30223@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <15A1809C-2CA3-4A3B-A5B1-279227C30223@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2D12367B34F8F54D9EF45BE5C1AB53D6@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/5sbC5M2Hm7bWWh6VeU7R_LAQkJw>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Does the HTTP freshness lifetime need to match the TTL?
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 22:23:40 -0000

I'm going to re-up this here on the list. Please see the discussion on
   https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/issues/153

It would be handy if people who disagree with each other offer text *on the list*, not pull requests, specifying what they want the text in the draft to say. Then, people to try to come to consensus on this. (Yes, some people are more comfortable with editing pull requests; I feel that this issue is too important to not have the discussion here on the list.)

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email