Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 19 March 2018 09:01 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF47124BFA for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IUSHOaQWGE8E for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [92.243.4.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B444D1200F1 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id E7483A05D0; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:01:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3EC2FEC0BB8; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:00:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:00:48 +0000
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org>
Cc: doh@ietf.org, Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
Message-ID: <20180319090048.GB16151@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <CAKC-DJjtHE89A=vG5iS_0M_jqnWusDUDnwyernd+FC1VxxmU5Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAKC-DJjtHE89A=vG5iS_0M_jqnWusDUDnwyernd+FC1VxxmU5Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/6dBKUd0QZHHnnyM3FqxM4ybijbk>
Subject: Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:01:53 -0000
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:20:35PM +0000, Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org> wrote a message of 86 lines which said: > At least for mobile, not using DNS64 synthesis in the client will > likely result in this either breaking the client in NAT64 > environments Is it a DNS64-specific problem? It could also happen if you have local-only domain names, dummy local TLDs, alternative roots, split-horizon, CDN, geo-based answers, or other DNS tricks. Yesterday, one IETFer told me that DoH was a bad idea because it allows people to avoid DNS-based national censorship… May be a warning "the DoH resolver may give you a different answer from what you would have got from the usual resolver"?
- [Doh] DNS64 and DOH Erik Nygren
- Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH Jim Reid
- Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH Patrick McManus
- Re: [Doh] [Ext] DNS64 and DOH Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Doh] [Ext] DNS64 and DOH Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Doh] [Ext] DNS64 and DOH Ben Schwartz
- Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH Lee Howard
- Re: [Doh] [Ext] DNS64 and DOH Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Doh] [Ext] DNS64 and DOH Jim Reid
- Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH Lee Howard
- Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH JORDI PALET MARTINEZ