Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [EXTERNAL] Re: New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 25 March 2019 11:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55071120454 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 04:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qvz31Bf6MlwI for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 04:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1122B120428 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 04:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1353; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1553512549; x=1554722149; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/q2s+KCKLMnGT1P5o7CWusRMjjGkS73NBc+hrnkHvUU=; b=mQN42UHDjrieh2PUxkgPT3qOovYHMOxER55ZpDwXYz1RktkAbepic3/C /Jt+X/oD12p7tQQxzE1jdMO9bUmVdBVd2vmZ+oW1Dn/15qgoweeKKh7T1 vVgcq2WvhkYS1LSQ5pF7HJl11hHGsDN10p5Bv2bK2CTe9URC1jdH5hBOL w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0APAABPt5hc/xbLJq1jGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVAEBAQEBAQsBghBoUCESJ4QOiHuMKSWaNQ0BARgLhEk?= =?us-ascii?q?ChS83Bg0BAQMBAQkBAwJtHAyFSgEBAQMBAQEhSwsFCwsOCgICJgICJzAGE4M?= =?us-ascii?q?iAYFtCA+tZYEvhUaEXQWBCyQBi0iBf4E4DBOCTD6CYQEBgWGDCjGCJgOlFgm?= =?us-ascii?q?TORmTfptUgnICBAYFAhWBYyKBVjMaCBsVOyoBgkE+gVgXiF+FQD4DMJAmAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,256,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="10894096"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 25 Mar 2019 11:15:46 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-105-142.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-105-142.cisco.com [10.61.105.142]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2PBFkSd031752 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:15:46 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8b885f68-702a-40e3-a9fe-9a779b0c5c24@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:15:45 +0100
Cc: doh@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FD51ECF3-7659-48BF-AD4F-0A1AF9C77722@cisco.com>
References: <04C556AF-D3B3-41A5-B119-8FE5F81FB9A7@huitema.net> <1878722055.8877.1553241201213@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <CABcZeBPmpN-cEPK92QQW3bkvc41Cx5g7B_YuUXCJK3j1qF995Q@mail.gmail.com> <20190322.101434.307385973.sthaug@nethelp.no> <32A78B0C-52B6-46E5-A46F-D63D21DEC52C@sky.uk> <CAOdDvNqb2+4Az+g608QRjYt+ZdUt1L9GAc=MJM3-xd0ZNmeBEQ@mail.gmail.com> <1C720263-10E4-423B-B152-5673E115A4C1@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903241755571.10798@bofh.nohats.ca> <02322DB8-D2B6-4AF6-B445-C56CBDC93123@cisco.com> <8b885f68-702a-40e3-a9fe-9a779b0c5c24@www.fastmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.105.142, dhcp-10-61-105-142.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/7cuYVnEiDRFLpYUiC9ZoL-JPveA>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [EXTERNAL] Re: New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:15:56 -0000

I think if you review my position on this list and elsewhere you will be reminded that I find the user interface aspects of all of this anything but simple, which is one reason there is a tussle in the first place.  Do not confuse my observation with “glib treatment”.  That would show a poor understanding of what a tussle is.

Eliot



> On 25 Mar 2019, at 10:24, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019, at 10:13, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> Putting aside legal language, but Brian’s basic notion is that the user 
>> can make an informed decision and the network can express its policies, 
>> with which the user can agree or not agree (and go elsewhere). Having 
>> the protocol elements to permit this sort of agreement is its own 
>> tussle.
> 
> I would encourage people who would like to participate in aspects of that tussle to join the capport working group.  
> 
> WEDNESDAY, March 27, 2019
> 1120-1320
> Karlin 3
> 
> The glib treatment of the role of informed consent here is probably worth some more discussion, but this thread is beyond the point that I consider it to be productive.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh