IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] New Privacy Considerations Section Proposal

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 21 June 2018 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE15B130EE9 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JX6ZWlpnKBYi for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9296E130EC5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5LJpjrP071702 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:51:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
References: <CAOdDvNpY4NpvSKW_D__jztDD_wkaRsJna9L+Br+hdnDnQ8w5SQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDt03Uv6UvtZw=mvo=+6dprGqUDMkC7Ef6bd=kb6vX_Fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNrjZu-q63DUhNjf7fYjNux2ewv4DTZkGPvFRrGfBBJFMA@mail.gmail.com> <c67dc5cb-f6a5-4352-da59-71c4bb9ff98b@nostrum.com> <fc01b1ca-c0ca-88af-abf4-5fcfc1d954a3@symas.com> <CAOdDvNrV7ue7oG4QcuU4vcWH4XTQCm67QEb+XFavrgway3TQzw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBV3dx-GgqHTpQdCYuPcs3KNXOkOWbHWaE33QFY9yfYig@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <53813713-9179-d91c-7b9a-01d32ede0e11@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:51:39 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBV3dx-GgqHTpQdCYuPcs3KNXOkOWbHWaE33QFY9yfYig@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/7xvbLMDRwtHEB3RaAitDCVdqejk>
Subject: Re: [Doh] New Privacy Considerations Section Proposal
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:51:49 -0000

On 6/21/18 12:43 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> There is more than one HTTP ecosystem, and forcing some use cases to 
> behave as if they are using it differently does not make sense.  A 
> DOH-only request stream does not need to send information on 
> accept-language; why would it do so?


Under the proposed guidance ("In making this evaluation DoH clients 
should use the minimal set of data
(e.g.  headers, cookies) that can achieve the desired feature set"), it 
would not do so.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email