IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] panel discussion on DoH/DoC

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 11 February 2019 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A04B1310BA for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:19:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pbJxxicjRWWh for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:19:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01051310A8 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:19:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id m11so8369330lfc.6 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:19:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6IK6ZC3k976kG68jeRxMezRcWD+FtPq5nZv2ZHUVSQU=; b=s34K/3vzG6tfOTzMHCuTpPpeHVdysc528Ma7R1H4lrhMG/uDvqxVLl3OFchuawoaV3 1lPb/xY3G7RfFwcvhIII2UNoMdq7FK8VvrsBCH5wG4WXp7hlAkYzbahbFFNWOBL26Qt0 1NpbHrlpus+b6So9NaZ9q/LKYaUcTVfaOhphtefHWdvUnQM4vwIzgxipEq5bDJwTASvz wOe8aDEKwuIirIWFxjVwD+ENsFt2F/wNhXJC0ekfCkKwNGr3VAKYzYi+HLTaLEc7Y67i fJaQLZjNQSe/M/7qxbSytMX0QwJhoViDEw48L9E75xkSgn5zu2uYVTZkjrbAvzekuvkZ jmiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6IK6ZC3k976kG68jeRxMezRcWD+FtPq5nZv2ZHUVSQU=; b=jx25fCOVdrRYw9FYxiSZ5zZ5iPl03P9u6MIJmkERG1xFRQwnPOmSGIQw/v/+8AWEl1 36MtxTILkM6Vnl7D+UYcOf7dn/W4x47bhNevhkUHcvQMbcqUmvHR1f0d4lEIJOUmf0ba SprviyoE6kwGx5jiX4xxI4m5FiQZi3tQMsnEeHJvFjFclvogRUxH1KNvETxLTLPRQ8CB C7k9/u17FkVNRAL3Gpl8j0qI5hWvk/HzuU1zUhs7Ckd2EvBGG4sUxb5UimsiUJ1HW1vA 961Mp3oklC5OJXLBOBVvoDqX9C/obq8nQXWBj0BHNYQjq4mepvdbRySY39AenWJYZmkw 6K8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuae73dUBNMJ0VHkgBLq3hv61zqfAmdyFk8o2g2NVeyEy0P3uMMh 7ZuKvI8mew0kDOzfm2NsQoRA68/hMPodk8aU3nf7TQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ibvy8+QQ820i3yFNAibPP7MXc7QP04u6xwuSwQk50FWUzY+U8SHItC9sGOTaHQfC7dbyTSVaosV1ZE2x/R5f1A=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:9904:: with SMTP id b4mr22809630lfe.95.1549905540934; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:19:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190207105106.GB1772@server.ds9a.nl> <C7C3BAF7-4BD4-4EE2-B3F2-1F8B49222980@fugue.com> <20190207130313.7g7hf4swaopnr75e@nic.fr> <FD7BFAFF-88B9-49BF-A652-3649ADCD53F9@fugue.com> <637C85D5-EACC-4C39-A220-753AC83FD78A@rfc1035.com> <35CBC108-69C9-4EB9-AACE-EEB39F802456@fugue.com> <1503183837.15474.1549549260349@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <97216205-8415-42F6-BF24-5FFB589FC887@rfc1035.com> <CABtrr-UfwtgmO80A9en0-4tyPKqRRdvwR3BVEQQv+ykrNt-=mg@mail.gmail.com> <f9a06c5d-7af2-46b1-5929-490c22c602bb@time-travellers.org> <CABtrr-WNfQ16FQWmtZFUoCDc1R3rua8zw8FCAr2JBNx4cLyaAA@mail.gmail.com> <1549842687.561412.1655109464.1F2DA0B4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <168d9e46ec8.278b.55b9c0b96417b0a70c4dcaded0d2e1c6@anvilwalrusden.com> <CABcZeBOXevwJne3uY0kMFk0b_w0Hx0e9qsHmBK61JdPd2hruBw@mail.gmail.com> <d122cbe2-3ea4-71cb-b4fb-9f90c7aef7d6@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <d122cbe2-3ea4-71cb-b4fb-9f90c7aef7d6@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:18:24 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBN-b+=whs4WjcAE=dg0ie+txjdu8mnjwmPLiTaeNOGgSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003411320581a181d1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/8adricuKIUlOeft_uFzHSP2R2FI>
Subject: Re: [Doh] panel discussion on DoH/DoC
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:19:05 -0000

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:40 AM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> On 11/02/2019 00:16, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > The general idea would be to have a list of DoH servers (operators, not
> > machines) and then to randomly select one for each client. We haven't
> > decided to do this, so also haven't decided on how we'd implement it :)
>
> I agree that picking one like that is no worse and likely better than
> round robin or similar, when considering how the DoH servers can affect
> the browser user's privacy in "normal" scenarios. I'd guess that the
> censorship scenario might call for something else though, esp if the
> selected DoH server becomes unresponsive. Be interested if you've
> thoughts on that. (Not sure myself what browser behaviours might be
> best in such failure cases.)
>

Well, as I said, we haven't really sorted this out. But it's also kind of
out of scope for this WG.

-Ekr


> Cheers,
> S.
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email