Re: [Doh] [EXTERNAL] Reviewing Resolver-Associated DOH

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 15 March 2019 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB09130F56 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6RPkllcAeGa for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A8EE130F3E for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2FKpkTI031585 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:51:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1552683108; bh=z7CjMCMRVwMLMAJI1l95foCGSLf7u12lSsF8QfuL1rs=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=XUqJFzDFCGnwLqdwKwJAAWqWtBtMunIVW6PoRwcE9UC3UCVWxUf2TGXpUKxveDcT7 REHBO9UtGLwE4aTcIdjMrxzM+1KUQzea+KS4oQr48iWja6D0TDpSa5lAGmAhARiUh0 JIz1EpRp1wjZchPB3jihgYxJpHH/KqyLQZ1aFePk=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: "Winfield, Alister" <Alister.Winfield=40sky.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
References: <CAHbrMsCNyeabhk0sVexOHVedVkgG2dvV9T8wWL++om5juAUvEw@mail.gmail.com> <ED16E0D8-BBCB-4316-A116-BA8513F523A3@sky.uk>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <e5693a96-420e-5d3b-ff30-d1c4511ea415@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:51:41 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ED16E0D8-BBCB-4316-A116-BA8513F523A3@sky.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------37FF1A3C323D6378D58B03FC"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/920rsC9q1J7QsndB7nUHIfrrLIA>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [EXTERNAL] Reviewing Resolver-Associated DOH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 20:51:51 -0000

On 3/15/19 8:41 AM, Winfield, Alister wrote:
>
>  1. IP-address certificates
>
> Bad ! Especially if the less enlightened think to try to create a 
> certificate for a private IP. Very bad idea
>

If you have more detailed thoughts on this to share, I'm sure the ACME 
working group would appreciate your input on 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-ip-05

/a