IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] New: draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Mon, 11 March 2019 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBB6130E2E for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=comcast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vr9brAryNPee for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com [96.114.158.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 523B5127598 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=comcast.com; s=20190220p; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@comcast.com; t=1552270043; x=2416183643; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Io5uyXrjNyx2EO615NVstbISfK+3wv2tpH9VrjuuE5s=; b=bkBNUBYYg3Ec+abDZVo58Jf44ktvhfeSdBZKpftKmrZ2jniouCYn0phdOpRnyx25 w8qe5WaHnq7MI2YpsBk0VntHutQ1OWR1oD6ITzbn1A4HKGEUzCmYFiO6c8T/BoiZ MtYeQqE2SMh9T16yN0lbveiNcugLFOeeZwb3rxCX3Xh+HW6weVD9aXVcAWeuHECp LY3ndlTxFmJYzkK6SercJ1JQeHIwBeYqX5F+h0zTORP/4PwZmWVC7izXyboKAh9w m+aOn2nAZFUcbnK39Bg0fyWpeN6YBlEqDFxLjCUrCXydj1cq9eK0IBfIqXs6dY7U GnOxKApLM8bRIKKo9+iy+tjMzWvLmCPgEOh73MPzU+sBJF/APmtQg8eJq6GRaBzS cv6UFXcdiaxLllhT4IfhMEzoKViB8HecOrJNz9CXWfU2sdMb5llnxTULHl4lmfZi 3TDU2cVWJwsqBXjlt0/Q1wZyuK27OiOXe7QJaA/wnwUUgheD/KyCIVhzXt/Fhb5g 43wC8iYBQPL5roJ+e6CouVf+pYNJF7X/yUoszXBd11cs+7O1d/3LGR/+yG1HTvVP DyXv9ovwNM8e8k0Jn+BszrkLKFNkE1/wd9UWPf0nSP1G+YE+kaCbZfTitoGU6ucz lva6Ae3Bwv6qNfNhElTFjnTUusmMbIiKhV/vVWx1nZw=;
X-AuditID: 60729ed4-2cdff700000044dc-6b-5c85c2db8987
Received: from COPDCEXC36.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.114.156.147]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 7B.9E.17628.BD2C58C5; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:07:23 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) by COPDCEXC36.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:07:22 -0400
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:07:23 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Doh] New: draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues
Thread-Index: AQHU1hbDDNj2GhBc2k6lTCYNWHxRBaYE8sAAgAC/ZIA=
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:07:22 +0000
Message-ID: <417D5522-AB62-4B40-813E-36A388667B49@cable.comcast.com>
References: <EA2A119D-06CF-4B0B-8994-86A99CD8AC0B@cable.comcast.com> <5c663bdb-c3af-9bf8-4a1b-6ccfa32b583d@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <5c663bdb-c3af-9bf8-4a1b-6ccfa32b583d@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.16.1.190220
x-originating-ip: [96.114.156.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <EF05472279EEAF4C84C0F51B91C15A6F@comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprFKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsu7tQ60xBl8/KFpcu3uRzWL63mvs Dkwea7uvsnksWfKTKYApqoHRpiSjKDWxxCU1LTWvONWOSwED2CSlpuUXpbomFuVUBqXmpCZi VwZSmZKak1mWWqSP1Rh9rOYkdDFlbF/ykbFgHn/Fwn17GBsY3/B1MXJwSAiYSMyYa93FyMUh JLCLSWL3la/sEE4Lk8SNTyuZuhg5gZzTjBInV+eC2GwCZhJ3F15hBrFFBNwkdr1YA2YLC7hL HOvrZoKIe0g0LHjIArJARMBKom8GC0iYRUBVYsmUr2wgNq+Ai8TTmz1Q48slPhz4CTaGU8BW 4vm17WA2o4CYxPdTa8BqmAXEJW49mQ9mSwgISCzZc54ZwhaVePn4HyuILSqgL7Gl7wELRFxB Yvv+bWAnMAtoSqzfpQ8xxkqi+9U6dghbUWJK90N2iHMEJU7OfALVKi5x+MgO1gmMErOQbJ6F MGkWkkmzkEyahWTSAkbWVYx8lmZ6hoYmeoamFnpGhkabGMEpZt6VHYyXp3scYhTgYFTi4W3f 0RojxJpYVlyZe4hRgoNZSYT33iqgEG9KYmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcV71zUApgfTEktTs 1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QDY1/fHUnG9X9m/HPV9zeznfNg4puuJ1rKMxLK2BZm3Lj/+0Edp9GrrjXz Z30KL/vhzpZf2p7/7I4O96d/T8sbvh27NKMvZWvbV7b+kIsn53Qz7qlccERtA8cFX6s7Whe+ OepLLZhiYekttN50fkfv3225Fdab7eZu+foicuPGV01y8jY9Op+je5VYijMSDbWYi4oTARcT pEMtAwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/9Cy9MQJqX74ErY9BjiPOg68R_6E>
Subject: Re: [Doh] New: draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:07:26 -0000

On 3/10/19, 6:42 AM, "Doh on behalf of Stephen Farrell" <doh-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>  (And yes it may well make more sense
    to discuss these topics in dnsops.)

[JL] Happy to go to whatever venue ultimately makes sense. :-)
        
>    I think I also agree with some of Stephane's criticism,
    (of this and also of draft-reid) e.g. the recommendations
    described here don't seem to me to be justified by the
    arguments provided - some I'd agree with, others not, but
    the current text just does not justify making that set of
    recommendations.

[JL] Yeah, that is fair. It's rather a long list and some parts are probably more certain whilst others more speculative. Given available time I thought getting the different points out for comment was best - after all that's what I-Ds are really anyway - just a doc to spur comment/discussion. 
    
>    I guess there isn't time before the submission cut-off, and
    it depends whether or not you really want this draft to end
    up as an RFC, but a serious re-structuring and merging with
    draft-reid could help a lot if the authors did want that text
    to end up in an RFC.

[JL] Dunno - we shall see. I'm not super fanatical about the doc itself. If merging it with others makes sense, or moving it to a different WG, or whatever - that is fine, I am quite flexible on this.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email