IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Consensus confirmation

manu tman <chantr4@gmail.com> Mon, 26 March 2018 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <chantr4@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9199A126DED for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g9e-VXumGVyq for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49BE1200C5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id p142-v6so26703325lfd.6 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XSePwJdcCVHVgCydF8bcDSyqkYZhOKvMNgaJg/LArQY=; b=CtBpeb9/MDoXFisnD4NLSU09+OxAwukfsVdCqbHqkfXJTapmy32yRY00nBRSRiwWuy ViE3ar3Zqj+NCOIU7ONBUchtcCUesU/pLNHoTFVU09hJ7fXLV8GJAyirAGzaj9Eep6sX 4LZi82MGAJxv4rbZYNkOXTmtA8vfc2ucWJkpeVjszj+Qd6cZz6gryKP3/Hlabk2cO3uV FHSWUlPvJxtlqifUp0mlYj9du2hWZy2zTn60r3SFtDpK0IvZKiPqFScPSK/2TOwn1UIq 68jDDDGUIqHUw58jE2XvRNKP17MrI1hvOTjimTzSbk4ba5lknY+W57y7SsztjjAznw/e B1Hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XSePwJdcCVHVgCydF8bcDSyqkYZhOKvMNgaJg/LArQY=; b=ftU7NWCuxdVrWJTFUYh74egAbEkSyw3hkn13X6iZC6rcKYhm8h3HxB2dqlSS38RhMN w3L2+QjYSltFk8jpX4GVRQv1GeZJ41fOKewobgJxhws0cA7osI0n3Q7+i7igGnkv1otF AicbjUhL3ZurEqONEkx8OGYPxZrzOZw6mG9GxUKAsT9cwdZOhXjmi0qwE4hr9/xVrY/e qhm3wr6h3qUpBjcjqRj6dTl9/Z7uYi5hbHYNTbv8PO0MPaquiDpbKjYg2OJksOjMEUNP pykgiTQIJRnvctOZBfG+x7ihYKP8oSCqqEEkM/2po6NLcmxs6r1xK5iTsDnuL9Cuym+8 yNSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FHdLsjLuF2awgRfqH+Yi2IDN4JJk/5W2tX0qHZtn1R/K3QBT6O YOMg6GLDafdLdE0ZN6SC98lxAXJWc0VnFb1+Uuc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELto8wJz+irbXEc/xQnoJhXWOIUjmfqUjSMlOVryQjJdIakcqms/WJNno99YtTVhazuPAL8De+yzT20bJP2pu7E=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:136a:: with SMTP id j103-v6mr24853982lfi.19.1522050978099; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHbrMsAs8G-eW7DTUtbdGukLszHohmk4NHhFPWw01+h3-v9Uog@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsAs8G-eW7DTUtbdGukLszHohmk4NHhFPWw01+h3-v9Uog@mail.gmail.com>
From: manu tman <chantr4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:56:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CAArYzrJbQA30bcuDLJP-7XihZYRvZysu1Lc7ttf4V1VoDdZGSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e137d805684c1be7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/COAjXtat6eSMuAAQNZmc2kmp19Y>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Consensus confirmation
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:56:22 -0000

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 6:32 PM Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote:

> Hi DOH,
>
> At the meeting in London last week, we asked the room for opinions on two
> topics:
>
> 1. Should we have a content-type that is Mandatory to Implement?
>
> Several participants spoke in favor of making the default format
> (currently called "application/dns-udpwireformat") mandatory, at least for
> servers.
>


Server must implement application/dns-(udp)?wireformat and client will be
able to choose whatever they want but can rely on wire format

>
> 2. Among the GET and POST modes of operation, which, if any, should be
> mandatory to implement?
>
> Among the participants, there was consensus in favor of making both GET
> and POST mandatory to implement for servers.
>

Yes, server must implement both and client is free to choose.

Manu

>
> If you would like to voice a dissenting opinion on either point, please
> reply on this list.  Otherwise, the chairs will regard these decisions as
> the group's consensus.
>
> --Ben
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email