Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Mon, 19 March 2018 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E53C126CE8 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jsQwt8CXVDwD for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D4A124BFA for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9b0e.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9b0e.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.155.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8372242147B; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:07:21 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180319090048.GB16151@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:07:20 +0000
Cc: DOH Working Group <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <675681BA-2B19-41A8-A8B9-F5BA1B0C2D50@rfc1035.com>
References: <CAKC-DJjtHE89A=vG5iS_0M_jqnWusDUDnwyernd+FC1VxxmU5Q@mail.gmail.com> <20180319090048.GB16151@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/E-F6o5D7EAbGa7XBOJ61nZvXHDM>
Subject: Re: [Doh] DNS64 and DOH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:07:25 -0000


> On 19 Mar 2018, at 09:00, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> May be a warning "the DoH resolver may give you a different answer
> from what you would have got from the usual resolver"?

Surely not! DNS sometimes lies. Tell me it isn't so. :-)