Re: [Doh] gethostbyname?

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Tue, 26 March 2019 11:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E161202D9 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lX9AqaxY7kc for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B8C01202D2 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id w13so7391246vsc.4 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3gsMOwvyOez+NWEJEGs+uYi644t2WXqnc7EmlK9Z8jI=; b=KWMsBvETuCQwDPMCSz8lRYctjgCqmkB0vuWSadYqEfLiSyOWRCwqfJl8jxU7IWRkIo 3YcVlhTBSifweKbjGAJREJlKRw6JA5h5S6yz3azoodRmQj7t2p8Q7usvyTq3zKobtNmk exIddZdYPT+fe5aN8uFzOYAAJqrnzFYwn8g3kqUpRsQGGlXab47TGYWyd1GFlZyaRKEJ SvM9sabBlTofBnRb5KF93mIVBhKJZw0QSz0PuH20FRNdH5WSfXjYf2qtXf3uHo7/aW82 uiUVaGgSTWG/bUigAyOUTt5TBT/+Ct2gkGftPTmXx3Cku4wTyNUM+AfRgAZ+R634A3F+ bjag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3gsMOwvyOez+NWEJEGs+uYi644t2WXqnc7EmlK9Z8jI=; b=OrASbIaqDQ66fxt73hhrfMqZjDvb3ocqVjfdk88L4deG8DVFLIolQYL4QpIZaILJ8L BGObj8Uxn8+MhBQuXB7AR/F2U36iCUo5MiSi49JwcR4SAPC4CUaKb1fKvn5KkOG+NzIQ Jd5jbUf2zbSSlYgywtrjnHwlKmdPqXCnaaYqTqqfixIagQ9Quo6y3dYLB0Up+zmAJAxV JSXkeOWpcscflLfNNbfoNWP9rnZu13kDzy1cn+sNpHymRErtwzscNXmkvT+lY29F3JJ+ pK6xCuh7dhMsnn1bAmg01rR2iNhree7hnVB/WanKaXqFT3SL3+gywIS1bQQdwKWEQOzQ FY7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVVccfqwzS7aDVrVWb1YRpW+S7YBm6Ckk9xVp4/utim1OQL+BFL qKEzE+2ObnLVnbnb27a69RPmLQsvqRHctla+iJ18yg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzsxo6aQyTys8HYvJ418v+Oru0AK/WHMVsp/Ho5JV77pNdictVNFTI8+OjbIxD6ppYUavZ42whCnk2MFn0Gsto=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f790:: with SMTP id j16mr18099483vso.232.1553599620288; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7D357986-AD33-4619-8037-8BCD59687AF0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7D357986-AD33-4619-8037-8BCD59687AF0@gmail.com>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:26:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsAvbj95kve3WQCEmt-BS70XafyKFJCg14L02Gndf4NR+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="0000000000008585ab0584fd99cc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/E-HDBFFGQvd0S98oCYQuJLH3ppg>
Subject: Re: [Doh] gethostbyname?
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:27:04 -0000

Please avoid casting aspersions on other working group participants, even
in jest, as it might be misconstrued and cause offense.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:35 AM Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a silly question. In section 4, the draft goes to the API level to
> specify how to resolve a domain name. gethostbyname was deprecated in favor
> of getaddrinfo (and therefore IPv6 capability) in 1999 (RFC 2553), and is
> now found in all common OS's including Linux, FreeBSD, Windows, MacOSX, and
> so on. A reference to gethostbyname in this draft comes across as ignorant
> at best, perhaps deliberately so.
>
> What do we need to do to drag the authors into the current century?
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>