Re: [Doh] operational issues with doh

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 03 November 2017 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F305613FEC2 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6dMIFus0_hnS for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x232.google.com (mail-ot0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED0F13FE6A for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 96so3905070otw.11 for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 15:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pNfGT3ftJ8mfFTh3V8mdpWysmzN8IbS2YShp5a5/prU=; b=HWtoHpg3V6D/mUgV8gs+KXhK2VwkgStjx835p2dpjoHoHC2hV0lnkpMNltbgC8lSwJ wey6vOURYqyND3KdLrS2pNLO59PoLJvrxJszx7NWjmW86JQkxgKozhOvwwzDlJj5Mx84 L79uk9ZTUJZuZoN9r0uDQ3KbQd06Lo3Fu+0iiIGv9E31zFN2nA/8hV3LzZJ1/MyZWIYJ DajkIygnBsCMK2bnCa+OyIeEyfM0WxuBf1k8J7t8nHNeqkv3MEwmm39NePRPThUOFfKR 9Qp2Jk8VMn+sp3a1UDR8ozPvLeazi9On3+uaUJzd7CpsHnseeoVkivnDJDbohfsHKsO9 4zOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pNfGT3ftJ8mfFTh3V8mdpWysmzN8IbS2YShp5a5/prU=; b=hStxixtEqWluRZFM2PbR/TbdG3ftxLFu+0SwklKZ7r2xZpDyHnOwbpB9VT7J4tt5mK OBbds2zRK7larR1p3ejKXx4JsheX/yR1akx4u/UzTZmnBMLDQT5aWU0p/kBLyAPTVTFv l6art5CKsJLdC1ChrGDdFq/efLTbCTvEA3lHwunSDRSwB6LuzBi9dzouYyRxoH49O1UY 0ybGbZ5gwG5AsHsSfMOAJkzo5VVUXFwb7LrtkQZDPPvSq8+YObNaAH4daYkN5OSxeph8 ZRVcn4WjKeula8GKeM8jDf0N7WRSKHLeGPowH5L8g3WXywoMqigWywj/fvCrVkGCfOfn QOfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6zRlcUKmAa6Altxh+k7vUco7A8W4LOekg1I66z0fPQ/pmw9Cfx 0ew9rrcNTP1CnSBHlYmVlWVFEmZgfLsXnP2drgs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RaM0xIhx7rIqdXNYhEzGrzdspW0veZfUiyhCQnsGpqg17ArBXhlWpb0/RN74eOOYeeR6OaZDA3Gy/Q80MORPA=
X-Received: by 10.157.87.75 with SMTP id x11mr5604151oti.112.1509748419728; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 15:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.72.178 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+H74a0ks3LTBgdYyCW2T98jDwGccKTEe6biOhA9SFrADg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <abe6593a-0bc9-9ed4-4ad4-c03093bcb490@cisco.com> <CAOdDvNoSONY2NkdzPYpSq=6sUWMo3Y3HJigWBWZpx9MDRcrr4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+H74a0ks3LTBgdYyCW2T98jDwGccKTEe6biOhA9SFrADg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 09:33:39 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWfrjf5tdP_dQSxfMR_2y53HfE6nmHvZMJKMRPhUsFUpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, doh@ietf.org, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/G4vgoZPC5a6R2Rg-drcWw5dj8HE>
Subject: Re: [Doh] operational issues with doh
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 22:33:42 -0000

Maybe someone can send an email outlining the operational concerns to
the list and we can discuss them first.  I don't know what these
concerns are.

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 7:16 AM, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agree with Patrick, this should be more of an operational considerations
> document.
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I think I would prefer a separate document if people were interested in
>> working on that.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Just to follow up on the lengthy discussion that took place during
>>> chartering, there are some operational issues that use of doh can
>>> create, particularly with regard to load balancers and split DNS.  Do
>>> those go into the draft or do they go into a separate doc?  It's quite
>>> possible they can be mitigated against, and if they can be, and if the
>>> text isn't too long, can I suggest that we start out by having some text
>>> in the draft, and if it starts to get lengthy we split it off?
>>>
>>> Eliot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Doh mailing list
>>> Doh@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Doh mailing list
>> Doh@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>