Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 28 March 2019 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DC7120433 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 02:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mn6mtxS5QRUc for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 02:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57EBC120448 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 02:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9796.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9796.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.151.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2S91OSl077671 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 04:01:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1553763688; bh=I2aQIQiTw5MstmfxipDKPW6p3hfT2w9zI308XLe2Aic=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=n7tPI+CZ7zTTR3bZnd3OBZMA6ec9vSUSg4/Ny81briTx0QTaCbiKiWgIjWlygDhrz WRW/cxxh8jd2UgsXqMQZhhEZwNb6muQ8OBJcIaq2EzD7s0HbP2DV26w57LUfYfSTrK iOQHCLRFUlSV6skG+WrebmerS237BAgacpY4APeU=
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
References: <CABcZeBOk5bM+3G2Jd3Lu33Z08gc=AeoZ8UFHzN6AYk4f_hjZ8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPUh6x=D+GfKg11+4bRouZdm1LcZvLm1jd4UUEJA832BQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903271629430.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CABcZeBOv0S8gHMYejhGkSncB4kX7KVFiYP3bHPLimdZ==epQQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCiqPJK=QAVvNufhGJ=uq2d9Znh2puau9GnQukw8vbiu3Ww@mail.gmail.com> <7d8c0bde-3393-7a48-ceeb-cf6db191f260@cs.tcd.ie> <CAH1iCiqEqbVDcaGtC+EzwiHFsFptKbvQMxg34UMO0CojWRb_mA@mail.gmail.com> <24f0d96b-c6e3-97b8-7ead-b1853b4171f6@cs.tcd.ie> <1351299192.23919.1553762643258@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <098b5e41-4c95-59c8-02e3-8d81791bc013@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:01:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1351299192.23919.1553762643258@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/GV6Qxxr2CGZPhvYJsGO76aYhxbg>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:01:46 -0000

On 3/28/19 09:44, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> More generally, beware that if you build an Internet that is designed 
> to work as if everyone on the planet were a dissident in an 
> authoritarian country, it is not unlikely that you will then get an 
> Internet regulatory and access environment that looks like the one of 
> authoritarian countries, even in democratic ones. 


This is getting pretty far off topic, but you're squarely confusing 
cause with effect. See BCP 188.

/a