IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Privacy Considerations Text (#2)

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Tue, 26 June 2018 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA231310FB for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNe5vU9gbOCr for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (linode6only.ducksong.com [IPv6:2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe6e:e8da]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588681310F8 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-f176.google.com (mail-ot0-f176.google.com [74.125.82.176]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C08BB3A05F for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:44:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-f176.google.com with SMTP id h6-v6so20186389otj.0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2b07fIhsIbNQfuig5+SR/OBirOywYuwXKtvHGDA5mh1thX1miT Myd+3X7tUa8fb4Xg8AkBnZIlv/+QJUK3JENJBFg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfzams6K67HM3Q8yE4FOzjTO6EtUj04uLahxw7Z5ZlSgkH55guVdDoscPBLaMEnMucEvLk7gaZyVnQclTiRn5I=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:cf2:: with SMTP id o47-v6mr742220otd.397.1530038653506; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:8a22:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2BA95ED9-629A-44CD-A91E-0176F171D4E3@sinodun.com>
References: <CAOdDvNpGSw6SP6COgJuJR_y2i1BjPWy3_i14vCYUP3jq6=zGuQ@mail.gmail.com> <0c003af5-6258-6de5-fdaf-161402c60b4d@riseup.net> <DAE6BABB-668E-4AAA-9BAC-4CFEADB2358D@sinodun.com> <CAOdDvNqWjE22Uss6ZWhtZgg9LZw1dSRCOxsU9C1UqwaMS0vx7w@mail.gmail.com> <2BA95ED9-629A-44CD-A91E-0176F171D4E3@sinodun.com>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:44:12 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNobPBkrPuERS1LmrJhEnQPBXMkGdSU0-EFoKzPD4b6tRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNobPBkrPuERS1LmrJhEnQPBXMkGdSU0-EFoKzPD4b6tRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006f6acd056f8fe266"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/HhH4C8NC4i_8jpBPKa-mvZdH_Yo>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Privacy Considerations Text (#2)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:44:17 -0000

Hi Sara. Thanks again for this.
https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/206

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:

>
> But I can live with this suggested text… we could say ‘standard’ (at the
> time or writing) here because RFC7871 (EDNS Client Subnet) is actually only
> an Informational RFC and ‘original’ could be read to imply there are later
> identifiers defined.
>
>
my PR ended up saying "DNS wireformat {{RFC1035}}" ..


>
> I’d like to see this say ‘at the cost of opening up implementations to
> the..’ to fully recognise the trade off but otherwise I think we are as
> converged as we are ever going to be :-)
>
>
sounds ok to me.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email