Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 22 September 2017 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4B91331B0; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tND3q_8dFE5Q; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36965133083; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2873; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1506056636; x=1507266236; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=f9dvuq+bPXNeF0M7F7mxIEQZgzLqdWxRkdf7cv6d+ZQ=; b=Hw8TccQLjN1A2ATGHuecjjpgKtaC/rSyBf27lfVhRE//xQGf4/66hC0V SSDgbxVfJmpg8VOu30IiJqPgiPQmGb/1j2YOKtDQnyTH4WszADWoFPml1 cj/oabb5ZhJ5yDHafEBIKNhPZ/FMHN8EmOXhVkIKwz6N4HsU7D2t7r8si 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B5AQAzmcRZ/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhD5uhB2LFJBQK5g7BwOFOwKEVhUBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQUjVhA?= =?us-ascii?q?LDgoqAgJXBgEMCAEBii+nLoIniwMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQERD4MrhWKCf?= =?us-ascii?q?YgOgmAFoROEO4IhjXyBe4ldhyaVPoE5NSJBTDIhCBwVh2c+jA4BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,426,1500940800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="697390132"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2017 05:03:54 +0000
Received: from [10.61.237.201] ([10.61.237.201]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8M53rrK029267; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 05:03:53 GMT
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Ask_Bj=c3=b8rn_Hansen?= <ask@develooper.com>, doh@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <150549029332.2975.12341647131707994474.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMBJAP23GmGf_ix-DMeOMB=Rbas+qsBQhrVwZuA5-Cv7Mg@mail.gmail.com> <EB3D58DB-1F8D-4E32-AE71-841EBCDDC3CA@vpnc.org> <42309404-8991-5d1d-7834-59087f273d41@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMDokEDbBiCR_TRQda2RBHxoHag6mQL57Uzn7ALqakm1Og@mail.gmail.com> <271db5c4-8d29-5a0d-cf7f-58e1e3831c30@cs.tcd.ie> <05C29362-CD48-429C-92FA-7F402869E58C@vpnc.org> <1e8323a8-4afc-397f-209e-099ffca212f6@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOdDvNqOnzpi5fujYGccUFt3oS4if+vALE6dkb9e8eJUh9o_OQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhOpnRt8hw3JmvLgxwWpOXcLs0TwAoCZHDe+816bCRp-Q@mail.gmail.com> <A66B9492-D51B-4021-9B65-71284C215595@develooper.com> <CAMm+LwgYK5TjBq-QLNcbJjde-pS8-A+=kWDD67cyfp+k_0VzDw@mail.gmail.com> <5BD60394-42BD-45E4-A964-A7F53C540FBC@mnot.net>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <b0ee0cb8-b7eb-80ca-b5ad-7545bc200769@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:03:58 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5BD60394-42BD-45E4-A964-A7F53C540FBC@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HM2VgX90GHwrtQJxsIHuEW32jwSosPLsk"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/Honl0yHvc6wx0F1t_OpX2Q6vSpk>
Subject: Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 05:03:58 -0000

Hi,


On 9/22/17 3:07 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I suppose, although it would be good to understand if perf problems to
> a dhcp configured resolver are widely encountered. 
>
> I wouldn’t be against text in the charter that allows the wg to
> consider mirroring currently defined (by the ietf) dns discovery
> mechanisms. I’d be against definition of new ones.

I know I wrote my last message would be my last, but I thought it would
be useful to indicate that the above would be fine with me.

Eliot