Re: [Doh] special meta QTYPEs

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 08 June 2018 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D855130EB1 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 06:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YiSazS9vI0gM for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 06:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22f.google.com (mail-ot0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C53A2130EB0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 06:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i19-v6so15757094otk.10 for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 06:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y0cfvLoe6hliN9nBgafOQxi7Gya5vDSC+CUPr6uHcdk=; b=CScfHTlqbcViKMzak7x/Grcguse8YC7FsMitP9cb1mvQUI5kXl8FW0bd0bYpfcPYzL P0NSuM+a1WH6H0OKWg+jjOtafV7oX0nFiLwaVcY818Ii7ymMZ9/7Ph9DvnI/hGVROVVK cH8fuUXmBAvHoXT2mvH7YhrOZS5SRTb9YiDpAPETSrXx3WUz7KNIULRLX7A+1D3dZgBI rku63WsgepKQSC4Mp2nL4+mxhBeGQslcy8sQCDqaIiXf7+sveHCzx4ivT36XP9nrWjG9 bLvDmRs1FFi68/taOBgtlg+7uDt0zefIc8//hw7giG1Iy+/+MloHAHv78P2/zLwO7PWd ++8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y0cfvLoe6hliN9nBgafOQxi7Gya5vDSC+CUPr6uHcdk=; b=gUG4h4SmZxRJ8IDQ7tpKAXPtTakgbzinZT4MKZ7fWIqsUMZZtGvN3hwvCgr29K+jz7 MDK2FZMItK7DXjJ2EMdg5dL29dcROgyHgBunmgk34ic6uKY4qHV9cFSYo33kfU3IRRig ocC2sMksoA1wyP+owv62mRhJcDu+o1lC2bMvPMRClYnF8RT5OUzkz7jJwqo+SUmVsdO4 XqiNqVgxsDgkOjrRG0uL+kP95sL/lCIG5gYNnxLCkODvud7JAXNK5M9E/59TyTizv68W /CbbnJowiOE7Z+IQDs60q9J4jOn7H1PQd5jnIOLQdKv4J3Y2qDG2PLIYoARUuWSXckH3 RRIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2k4yRRQTkZB3+jJ+Q3QfUNjZPwDp8GLV+NFew7nr1J3ICQqCZd 1uhMVZKBgtlMloVlDSqp7vjkg7nsYRANLPPR+UI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLRsL1I/q9TrkWU7D1bvAIzmTfPxUEdl1z5GkmgaYDETp+iQ4297E166upmKsY6BLDV2o1WJcmBVwyyf0/leZw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3666:: with SMTP id w93-v6mr3504842otb.394.1528465911001; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 06:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806061519020.10764@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <23321.25626.316926.975797@gro.dd.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806081429030.10764@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806081429030.10764@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:51:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWtc4rfzR1LfyF6Jx3HsfAj3nU9vGKBYaFy9bSTq+stJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: tale@dd.org, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/Htdytooy3rLdBk95-zsoQTvXruA>
Subject: Re: [Doh] special meta QTYPEs
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 13:51:54 -0000

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 3:38 PM Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>; wrote:
> I was speaking in general terms, of course :-) An AXFR client has to be
> prepared to handle multiple messages in a response, regardless of the size
> of the zone, so a DoH proxy that tries to support AXFR cannot avoid
> learning how to cope with multi-message answers from its upstream DNS
> server. And it isn't always possible to de-fragment an AXFR response: e.g.
> it will break any TSIG authentication.

That's interesting.  Are you saying that a multi-message answer that
is TSIG authenticated cannot be carried in DOH?  I think that's what
this means.  Would it require the use of something like
multipart/related to faithfully carry the answer in that case?