IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FB0120285 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j30Uftwwb0Hz for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 415E1120297 for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local ([62.168.35.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2TJUAKQ022054 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 14:30:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1553887813; bh=vjRCVlifNR0QNczsG1ePr4Cjr3kSf7xLunRbTheY0MA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rgmKC3FwdrpzsHsqUANhukcP/neybGfucBzGDqJm72Mc+eGkU6DPw5bzhURseO0Be U8t+6g/GgaJkXbeOxEfDfsDIiQ4SUx5ehB1YLMVYn381MdGx/+DtxdTnzra5tlsOeD X4wXFMSoMP17iYlEg4jYWgpyD+dHAFLZgmvRsQZk=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [62.168.35.69] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
References: <CABcZeBOk5bM+3G2Jd3Lu33Z08gc=AeoZ8UFHzN6AYk4f_hjZ8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPUh6x=D+GfKg11+4bRouZdm1LcZvLm1jd4UUEJA832BQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903271629430.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CABcZeBOv0S8gHMYejhGkSncB4kX7KVFiYP3bHPLimdZ==epQQg@mail.gmail.com> <f983e770-f3ad-86ab-0b99-a0b15165c9bb@nic.cz> <92eb504b-42ff-fd35-b8d7-848d740736b9@nostrum.com> <CAH1iCirmAMys7vBZZYdzziPWN-GR25togfG7TS5Z192S=Ffbhw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <f70febfd-0ca9-8eb6-7c77-1a0c80f60503@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:30:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCirmAMys7vBZZYdzziPWN-GR25togfG7TS5Z192S=Ffbhw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8290B242BABADDC47A1A159E"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/Ils9haex9FcsdBkQYyuHSWsxWs8>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Mozilla's plans re: DoH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 19:30:20 -0000

On 3/29/19 17:49, Brian Dickson wrote:
> Could you clarify, to whom were you addressing the message re: BCP 79?
> (The possibilities seem to be, Petr, or the whole list, or maybe 
> implicitly any WG participants who are employed/sponsored by whoever 
> owns that patent?)


The specific request was for Petr, although it's never a bad time for 
anyone to go refresh their memory about the contents of BCP 79.

/a

v2.3.2 | Report a Bug | By Email