IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] New Privacy Considerations Section Proposal

Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Thu, 21 June 2018 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sara@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09371310A2 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PlHbegEdDqFO for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81F19131246 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:b98:204:102:fffa::409] (port=55742) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <sara@sinodun.com>) id 1fW0X6-0002pP-RJ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:26:00 +0100
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
Message-Id: <DB56D720-78F2-4DF3-A205-E820001222DB@sinodun.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B23603B3-C1DD-4CEF-9688-D3C3FE346065"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:25:55 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNqO9Z3tCUeeS+XYfSLNpv=mJGVSGR9EJO2Xb2cQ=_uk2g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
References: <CAOdDvNpY4NpvSKW_D__jztDD_wkaRsJna9L+Br+hdnDnQ8w5SQ@mail.gmail.com> <a8f12fe6-57d8-70ed-dc68-126c972b75f4@riseup.net> <CAOdDvNrfQuN4ePV2qeh9jChmaOhjp9VQWD4xeiNBUgSSJAre5Q@mail.gmail.com> <9fe2b4d7-14a7-934d-cd38-a7396dfec48a@riseup.net> <CAOdDvNqQVDn3SVpPNwm4bj63dps41x7EPu3VENGYUdAVh0cDxQ@mail.gmail.com> <60056EED-498C-4E85-85A0-48A646FE04DC@sinodun.com> <CAOdDvNqO9Z3tCUeeS+XYfSLNpv=mJGVSGR9EJO2Xb2cQ=_uk2g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/IpDI8xXNWbagXvB33iF5ziAPlfY>
Subject: Re: [Doh] New Privacy Considerations Section Proposal
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:26:15 -0000


> On 21 Jun 2018, at 15:16, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com <mailto:sara@sinodun.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> One further issue - RFC7626 (DNS Privacy considerations) is currently an informative reference. If the draft  is going to argue that all implementors must make their own decision about balancing HTTP functionality against privacy then RFC7626 is a document they should be required to read. I think this should be a normative reference.
> 
> unfortunately 7626 is informational and making it normative from DoH would (aiui) be a down reference that isn't allowed from a standards track document.

Good point, well made. I missed that. :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email