IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Use cases and URLs

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 07 March 2018 04:04 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AB5124BE8 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:04:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tk8fu2F8Sl3g for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03F751242EA for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w2744AHV037528 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Mar 2018 22:04:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "doh@ietf.org" <doh@ietf.org>
References: <24DEFAAB-D2A3-45E5-8CEE-E2E4EA23B9C2@icann.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <5bca3f4f-e40a-4afc-c71a-25ede395a065@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 22:04:05 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <24DEFAAB-D2A3-45E5-8CEE-E2E4EA23B9C2@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/KbwBmC-_gJHBSCAzVl2hKNA3gro>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Use cases and URLs
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 04:04:36 -0000

On 3/6/18 9:49 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> The current draft says that there is no standard, and every origin will have its own URL for the API. This makes it much harder for a user to add new configured DNS API servers


Can you elaborate on this a bit? I fully expect that the typical 
user-self-provisioning case will involve copy/pasting server 
information, in which case the difference between a server and a URL is 
pretty minimal. Do you expect users to type server names in rather than 
copying them?

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email