Re: [Doh] GDPR and DoH

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Sun, 07 April 2019 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A248B120049 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2019 07:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGVKKJnztVR9 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2019 07:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92151120005 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2019 07:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x37Eu4nl089130 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:56:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1554648968; bh=dL4AXDgDk8umVLas0J03oZRFvhVSQVoOo0zz603TvT4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=qaa+UZC4+4Sl1Pq1yKYUV1T1p7eZpaFYALgcaMhhYbCrG5ijRsVuKMLywGuFX57H4 ysWigYFKmqmBbiTkuLP9d+0uCOuWob3ekQkR0uD7jEDpdpsV+agF/DNznBecYNVdMH fyq+1h1tSzfAhZ0Holh/FsqFtXhXnsPJwMXNI1go=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Orochi.roach.at
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
References: <1700920918.12557.1552229700654@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <7667c4d7-2e78-0a27-84af-cf1c00fd4897@cs.tcd.ie> <1991054337.12802.1552259263075@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <eea64b30-aad0-a030-5360-1b1484f1d0e3@huitema.net> <CAPsNn2WhjHSEHJUEL8GB6X0d24fkajgPnY4YgkOQbXjyxb5q8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CACfw2hj07TDCxK9bm0T=JguKyuCEfW2zb_yRJnewjOYL4oxdjA@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cmk7NbF+ti0dU7Fp0PK8Gt4P5knC5hrHVLDY59-jaYYzA@mail.gmail.com> <6030358E-24FF-4033-B0A1-AB1123FED964@rfc1035.com> <5ce0d730-aac2-95c9-fead-64cbffa03d52@cs.tcd.ie> <AE840785-E355-4BCA-A9E1-AFFA069D801C@rfc1035.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <de4e8320-302d-181d-09d6-34659763da2a@nostrum.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 09:55:59 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AE840785-E355-4BCA-A9E1-AFFA069D801C@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/OAo2QezV6QVZ_2mYvvcCWF42B2U>
Subject: Re: [Doh] GDPR and DoH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 14:56:13 -0000

On 4/7/19 15:33, Jim Reid wrote:
> That said, I think it’s important that this WG is at least aware of these problems and documents them somehow.


Are we going to do a survey of privacy regulations in the other 167 
countries also? How frequently do you see us updating such documentation?

/a