IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: Alternate proposal for transport indication in draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 04 April 2018 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FC8120713 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KZ1eXOpz7rvn for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB07F12D7E5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id o64so23592592qkl.7 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Tp8SkonCyPDPl6ldo/j8e0QRF1IjjXkQ6UsA3ope+3A=; b=pyvzblfrHUEPcL/nc3V6s2pJNg1/Bg5uJdRUJnGCK4Ni3+Oo9ZisBV+oCiB1X0M83o BXkwHd0q841EF9j5/eHWKZ0eN/YVR2fqC6S6PN+8E+z3nZe2j92PSsOAK27cl7ymfgdc DFPk3eToWhWsYFhMDwbasy27oFzzyW+AT5VxQR4KCcGbbO6z8mR2pmN0J7jVNbx87zJU 585IsEfNbNrJu86wCWmoc/jTVqkBgJTWot7DJOe76WMpWqVhJ4lDtUVLA/ixDE8r7s3I 8KeSzV6oUEma1loGaSiQlJ7g9NrwpZtIoVzrXZmKHUSd0OzdFoCjpy11Hmr3/y4HIoPA yvBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Tp8SkonCyPDPl6ldo/j8e0QRF1IjjXkQ6UsA3ope+3A=; b=cD1TQ6sRUq8mR7Y1pSX5TS23qeonQEHk8KLDV3mZjgBsyig3JqV6vWs5KojJ+tkSyI DoSj6HVWDdSeNJ6uP3UAYZtiQPcVUuldCW+eSFtP6zXvViLeRM4xYgIwPEN3CpR19GUb 1oGA0dayAn860YuBLia7beZhS1GTBNKtgVjSV4C+EvQ9R75hKqaXxWYrEyDROb8dHw6i B62sPgbCTZVWWGQ2QDJPXS4irTtvYkgqtfTyxHbR21HYxZ/Dyv821YyBCa1OeV2MvHaJ Ba+lppHtEPDAK6yfqEq04B6V1FxnC1tojf0iXrAUdD8mw0ORgRfhG0MRLA9wqi60iAFJ QN7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCgKiIlU1N5+EQFm6KVUFNiL5aQpDdWp3NvkJAQK7U65S0wr0v2 WDRo4+kAzuCse2yTisAkma5eP/aIkiI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/UcIMgu2o36/t/DKjYk6BZJVBwZgAp2oEIqxTHwAS+rsIb90vcyVjIYnMhhpxQ3g+m9Bn1kg==
X-Received: by 10.55.192.20 with SMTP id o20mr25303595qki.257.1522867494795; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.144] (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d198sm4409575qkg.91.2018.04.04.11.44.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <24035AD9-C0C4-4BE4-A58A-0E010FB3D0F6@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1F75059F-C875-4309-B3A6-232F1A6D4E5C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 14:44:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5AC51AEC.10603@redbarn.org>
Cc: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, dnsop@ietf.org, doh@ietf.org
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
References: <152168039295.5550.9572034766968749020.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnX2jGY_JpVbqJuQdDVUyVzsuM_2CDg4nppfqQHZQm0F+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAObRXKHhk51DxNt5uiYB0gunJ=DNde2j9FJSU=Ky2m4Q1UkhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVL0XaUDS-WzDGaN9-kLx9p3x1+UVuWhvx=Zyo5oRos+w@mail.gmail.com> <19BED07A-942E-4A46-93A6-09770083EFF9@icann.org> <CABkgnnX-=n-reO9yjA8a2pHAD+JtoS5wX1w-dXMnDFdt4HXu-g@mail.gmail.com> <23236.18671.182273.977633@gro.dd.org> <28199575-e2e2-6966-fe17-f678f9f397f3@bellis.me.uk> <5AC4C2F7.7050906@redbarn.org> <3630b151-9628-235e-a5b1-c838b777d9d2@bellis.me.uk> <5AC4E70C.7020003@redbarn.org> <A0A55AED-0CB2-478C-913A-DCA678FBAC33@fugue.com> <5AC4F11F.3050009@redbarn.org> <602DF02A-3A85-4B3B-9E11-F7A701BD25B5@fugue.com> <5AC4F3F5.6080408@redbarn.org> <C2CAFEF1-7A0B-496E-9AE0-7229E4B4062F@fugue.com> <5AC5006C.4050308@redbarn.org> <5307DF51-689E-41C3-AB4A-59611EAD4DA3@fugue.com> <5AC50A04.6030407@redbarn.org> <7E0DD069-A6C4-473F-B51D-5902C7E96A5C@fugue.com> <5AC51AEC.10603@redbarn.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/OhsKS5Mo32DA_YJoi4nfgnehzBI>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: Alternate proposal for transport indication in draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:44:59 -0000

On Apr 4, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:
> could this be done with a resolver using non-proxy DOH as a transport to its forwarder? sure. but that puts semantic intelligence in the middle, which will introduce configuration, logging, monitoring, diagnosis, upgrade, and patching costs. i don't want those here.

So essentially this is {UDP | TCP}-over-HTTPS, with constraints on the destination port?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email