IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Consensus confirmation

Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com> Sun, 25 March 2018 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <olafur@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BB2126D85 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E8U6o-kB4o_T for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64586126579 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id r82so11949677wme.0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sIdwNCkgMShQ4tQVv62SlDXUW1TH9zvlxOS5LrjeFtg=; b=qomETDstNC8CwvYalteG5zUaaWRvmFcErLgXeotEcnMk5+nuhlOsRF2y/f8Db9Z2Xe Q4WQBzlSz/EcewLHcMPdhZIzjSkp4s8cdlEZxTa1Iiy+Ci60dz1is/lDpttfElJF4A90 zBVj94SlQ+gXzqZb9IzoVMbFNmgdsEwU6mWZ4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sIdwNCkgMShQ4tQVv62SlDXUW1TH9zvlxOS5LrjeFtg=; b=quIAFOlaeNiERasFxevBVzWqyHQOcFOSDE16QplXDda7h4rlWwKHmUSad0jnISkFcC 34Ze6SgCgz7ed/+9NFG2WA2ucrkH0J2sMuH0ViNTctWwKs3pG3vTpagwzqABBJ6YocZ6 GKgpn6XmGPaGyvCponNhmCIS2Rms6KNFwDjksg8/WIUmd7RWf/NsG4mX0yoYbwKvW4kC FkOR9p4m6IHD0Wc9rIkPurGb/UFXiEaf8QsqzB77u/cHHs7B+T1C4IFiRX0KGrNbHhdk jnQJYATsug6Xr5rF7EdmZmeIAgL58J5wS/+lABSXGBrwOUmU9Lrm97grnKNzk3yNlVor /y3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GJ+0iznh15L6ww/NnbhQ6v7hE53pN0iZvmCMdQ6kBctfZcr+zo GWn641oa6sHWUIh74cSGxnythRDOxwxhIGHy5W7UsA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvpHFI8fERPWdsSNpRgbjX0gVM33wD2s9ixwCGlA0VpE5EFnll2DlWzC7UFkHsfElFp72fOcqvvWNWN0p9U3pU=
X-Received: by 10.28.109.88 with SMTP id i85mr13069734wmc.150.1522010812804; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.169.41 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsAs8G-eW7DTUtbdGukLszHohmk4NHhFPWw01+h3-v9Uog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHbrMsAs8G-eW7DTUtbdGukLszHohmk4NHhFPWw01+h3-v9Uog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 21:46:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAN6NTqzqwFTs7eqhsBH++ibZfrq+bypbkUKLiBTpWqBmD__cJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147c456d78749056842c1c5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/Ozk2PqaMtsF2imL-51Z8rKaAWqk>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Consensus confirmation
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:46:57 -0000

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote:

> Hi DOH,
>
> At the meeting in London last week, we asked the room for opinions on two
> topics:
>
> 1. Should we have a content-type that is Mandatory to Implement?
>
> Several participants spoke in favor of making the default format
> (currently called "application/dns-udpwireformat") mandatory, at least
> for servers.
>

My understanding was that the name was to be "application/dns-wireformat"
and I support it to be mandatory.

>
> 2. Among the GET and POST modes of operation, which, if any, should be
> mandatory to implement?
>
> Among the participants, there was consensus in favor of making both GET
> and POST mandatory to implement for servers.
>
> If you would like to voice a dissenting opinion on either point, please
> reply on this list.  Otherwise, the chairs will regard these decisions as
> the group's consensus.
>

Both is fine, but have slight preference for "POST is MUST and GET is
SHOULD "

Olafur


>
> --Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email