Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 21 September 2017 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EDC1321A6; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yzLljDzhQaMg; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50D4132199; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id h66so12541762ioh.11; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=fLFMggws0E42Y/MJxTUrwwWIgMVAJrKPugaKvfCaruQ=; b=bOTVwy9mghq/4+p39X5bDAUlIEQlYEwSYZy60AcSKWy6Q9KlI83bsQ89UcGP735qEW a/HAymtwzXPCK8Y60ILSMhk+qZT0+17KVu2Tgoewf/jkcCR7kA70F3jZYf9JfwLU933+ TNtwNsj6Lknp0kK7bICLEenEaAiTyNXHrB9FyOmVi8NAvsTmLIqzmQYzG9sH7B9OC/7X 7dYfKebAgfvyMrLUgJ4q9v8B092Gk0s3aYSz79+a1QbD20e9pRN+qTEXwsZOL/T8E4rT xrrY3ndlfwqo+BbsCuu9d31BMKyqf1Xp2RHrvP4SayruPmSNvPX9uwRYX7kavj+ZZ6jm agzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fLFMggws0E42Y/MJxTUrwwWIgMVAJrKPugaKvfCaruQ=; b=KbqtETswiXdUgg6qVo3T9cB/7ZiXcAP+Pip94aM5++BL0yhN0QRUqv/bb3sjm7bO89 8GkSMk3pacRYnswJIPYAGAF0EQZLHBJeWlldkWWPOtqOyXwaPJbtoJWXxL2ovR38yzGh 3aewnOyJ1LJzKwZZcA1yrA9gpewQ5Zat6/igwyR16ulIpzKYljFM57nprfCj1KQfo4X+ lWiuX37IEXdzT6U2FJ5m9LcMaMdDH7Fi6oDrPPpYgAki5LlbWKsd2IjctS602ZAEvQ0h VxFqhxSy/yQUPb+Ul8uRTKHYVTIlPB9jvQHilDuxwYr3wm2oo+CqMu9wfDWw1ArxSnVQ 0FXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjLhQuFBbmjDAW9Wj5JRoQWLhzG5iCMhc9bGbNkJ5HYyAuqlqEw Xe7TbeZgYU69RTyax9Sc2OZN6prz7MLRLARmuhc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDd4n6hkFwghTMs/WSKmxyoV2cs3XeEhkGNYLafWyK8daIlyFhOMROtqxn3U+XBMvBxb8pLbIm5knHwhvm8oYA=
X-Received: by 10.202.75.66 with SMTP id y63mr3020620oia.5.1506015659940; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.157.46.177 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A66B9492-D51B-4021-9B65-71284C215595@develooper.com>
References: <150549029332.2975.12341647131707994474.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMBJAP23GmGf_ix-DMeOMB=Rbas+qsBQhrVwZuA5-Cv7Mg@mail.gmail.com> <EB3D58DB-1F8D-4E32-AE71-841EBCDDC3CA@vpnc.org> <42309404-8991-5d1d-7834-59087f273d41@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMDokEDbBiCR_TRQda2RBHxoHag6mQL57Uzn7ALqakm1Og@mail.gmail.com> <271db5c4-8d29-5a0d-cf7f-58e1e3831c30@cs.tcd.ie> <05C29362-CD48-429C-92FA-7F402869E58C@vpnc.org> <1e8323a8-4afc-397f-209e-099ffca212f6@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOdDvNqOnzpi5fujYGccUFt3oS4if+vALE6dkb9e8eJUh9o_OQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhOpnRt8hw3JmvLgxwWpOXcLs0TwAoCZHDe+816bCRp-Q@mail.gmail.com> <A66B9492-D51B-4021-9B65-71284C215595@develooper.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:40:59 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: TLcExzaOzSCrm67ryA3qngm6ROE
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgYK5TjBq-QLNcbJjde-pS8-A+=kWDD67cyfp+k_0VzDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ask_Bj=C3=B8rn_Hansen?= <ask@develooper.com>
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, doh@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113dc0a66fe3ed0559b6989f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/PuwJA_UDUM0tgRGtoaZpBr7YI_A>
Subject: Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:41:02 -0000

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask@develooper.com>
wrote:

>
>
> > On Sep 16, 2017, at 9:07, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > 1) I see no evidence that HTTP/2 is suited to Web Services or will be
> dominant in that role. HTTP/2 was designed to serve Web Browsing to the
> exclusion of all other concerns. Which was the right choice to make.
>
> HTTP/2 is also better for services with many small requests, in particular
> on high latency connections (or where each response might be slow to
> start…).
>

​If Web Services actually used HTTP features other than Firewall bypass and
framing of transactions, then HTTP/2 might be attractive. ​Given how little
of the HTTP stack is used and given that QUIC is a much closer match, that
is the route I want to take.

I think it likely QUIC will eat up COAP as well.

Just think of QUIC a way of doing TCP/2 in a way that is compatible with
the protocol stacks as deployed in the field. At some point there will be a
way to specify the service endpoint in a consistent fashion.