[Doh] Ongoing discussion of DoH, DoT, and related issues

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 08 April 2019 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9881201E6; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYItcDuzXSCS; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f43.google.com (mail-io1-f43.google.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A541200A1; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f43.google.com with SMTP id p16so11923625iod.2; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=n7PXX5w8k50J/E8Pymhjie+q5xHUwUi7o5Ex45cxw58=; b=BiyFo23NO9Dnmmsg4dBn2cmhO9sFirx6Kpz1zkiJisNw+lE/ykaCMNengypS2/XTrE 7nuDzeyb26xTBjOQVCpAQkf8TSgFUykl7V/1l1AibriNisZfhUv90WKCuc4qq1r5Iqsp qMW62UsJ3z+/ZN7OY280z1u/uLuHJXeGpAzUyIMo9a6qgRU4tF8p0fKe9ijbYbJRtNiP hJ71MQWYH5sp/OphVxzZG1zy/R9HdevCEJhozZkCH1vuagKTh1TQDmbFRD+OtYQbF9YN BEfo3rITHQNVReS2mRkF+vSZkBwUvC3eQ65UdulG0NQjuc53ZNaf9A38aeXg59fcK+sr 8jCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVsr60j1gkwludIx25Kg13W+nf/zyCI3maXzABNKxdVDB+myu6U 4GpSfL/IMtEkd1rKpjkHu4PSA7/Cpi8ubGkd4K9tUyL1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzLCsCMpNEHvs2ms85uQwuwOzMBrIWAiF0cWSF37DwMRBCCTpej8qUb01wCvGmUjY5Vz0n+/lDCHAnvjG9hPQc=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7417:: with SMTP id s23mr21147710iog.2.1554747597606; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:19:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJKuFYvpM1gt0U_ve-WcjXRVUnDtb=R5gyDDw029D9vGiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: doh@ietf.org, dprive@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, add@ietf.org
Cc: doh-chairs@ietf.org, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/QREpvpvAIN_xUw4FwFfRlCXdZc4>
Subject: [Doh] Ongoing discussion of DoH, DoT, and related issues
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 18:20:04 -0000

A mailing list has been created for the ongoing discussion of issues
with DNS over HTTPS, DNS over TLS, implementation choices for those,
application usage, operational concerns, privacy concerns, performance
concerns, and any other such.  Please take all that related discussion
to the new list and please stop discussing it on DOH, DPRIVE, DNSOP,
and any other lists — that will keep the related discussion in one
place, and avoid fragmenting it and having people repeat themselves
because of the fragmentation.

The new list is called ADD — Applications Doing DNS:
...and it's in the "to" list of this message.  Subscriptions are now open.

With this message I’m asking the working group chairs for DOH, DPRIVE,
and DNSOP to be strict about stopping discussion of these topics on
their lists, and directing people to the new “ADD” list.

Of course, work directly relevant to the charters of these working
groups should continue on their respective lists, as usual.

For the longer term, the relevant ADs are discussing the right path.
At the moment that looks like a BoF in Montreal (IETF 105) aimed at
forming an “ADD” working group, most likely in the ART Area but with
significant crossover expected and desired from Ops, Sec, Int, and
probably the rest of the <strike>solar system</strike> IETF community.

Barry Leiba, ART AD