Re: [Doh] [EXTERNAL] Re: DoH

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 28 March 2019 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2291203A2 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKoFhhqFsYeb for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C671203A5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.150.196] (dhcp-96c4.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.150.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2SMBjqk011994 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:11:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1553811112; bh=y0bU+L6kQGWskUpKHvEOcEaOPXB0s3vOyoTscK+zgyU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=XbD3Sg4TfVp8AJYdsjbnKCx3SfAKJf+cW+mMBhjX0SriRQ+KSM+Kc4Ve1AzAsjAew mujUIfW4epkUNA8nFm0qAlGfmzK+S5mBO1B2nltMKPHyzvYKfn6J7yLW3/TeBG2eSp GmR+ai2cHTItassFHHW3Dr7B4i4kswOMCGMlVvBE=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host dhcp-96c4.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.150.196] claimed to be [31.133.150.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-55BC499A-08C9-404F-AEBF-2D64DC1C8A01
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57)
In-Reply-To: <9E29A232-BA75-478D-96BF-5D6164142BDD@sky.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 23:11:44 +0100
Cc: "andrew.campling@bt.com" <andrew.campling@bt.com>, "john@johncarr.eu" <john@johncarr.eu>, "mcmanus@ducksong.com" <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, "paul.hoffman@icann.org" <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "doh@ietf.org" <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <0E079DEB-DEFC-4DE7-BEAE-AAD02BB61D56@nostrum.com>
References: <DB7PR03MB4698C510EC609C85725FC158C6590@DB7PR03MB4698.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOdDvNpJqaemDTHcUtTQ7Xc1cq5OOFU91qq_h97j6Uv1RTHD7A@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR03MB4698A645255E883C9CC07AC3C6590@DB7PR03MB4698.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <73a0935d-f80b-0e8d-eb89-cb35a473122c@nostrum.com> <826904ddc23941d5be4d8872c4f2737a@tpw09926dag11h.domain1.systemhost.net> <2af82a6d-6887-ae36-4527-47e476829345@nostrum.com> <9E29A232-BA75-478D-96BF-5D6164142BDD@sky.uk>
To: "Winfield, Alister" <Alister.Winfield=40sky.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/Qnswmq97Yfauoc3AG2QpQFXs-1M>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [EXTERNAL] Re: DoH
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:12:03 -0000


> On Mar 28, 2019, at 22:40, Winfield, Alister <Alister.Winfield=40sky.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> NB: Don’t bite I do like the protocol and I agree that there are some that need it to exist.
> 

Not going to bite, but I’ll point out that your response is largely unrelated to the query that started this thread. Perhaps you meant to reply to a different message?

/a