Re: [Doh] WGLC on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https

Thanks for this suggestion. I like it.

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> The text in the latest GitHub version of the draft now uses phrases like
> "a client MUST specifically authorize DNS API servers”.
>
> I’m not clear if there is any difference between ‘authorizing’ a server
> and just using a server? If there is some subtlety here then I’d like to
> understand if but if not I created https://github.com/
> dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/174 to simplify the text and
> also put the discussion of selection of server in its own section.
>
> Sara.
>
> On 30 Apr 2018, at 18:59, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:
>
>
> 4) Section 8: With regard to trusted/untrusted servers I would suggest at
> least a small restructure for clarity. At the moment the first discussion
> of the client trust model is in section 5.3 ‘Server Push’.
>
> I would suggest adding a section before this (possibly after section 3)
> called something like ’Trust model for client queries’ with the following
> (combining text from section 5.3 and 8):
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>
>