Re: [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Mon, 11 March 2019 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D9812D4ED for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=comcast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PX3ZgePeob3a for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [162.150.44.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 076D01286CD for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=comcast.com; s=20190220p; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@comcast.com; t=1552267553; x=2416181153; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Q/qZS+lSA0PAIMFo/tkuocDMhfB5nBm6aX5hq+oBEzM=; b=AhT+EWQvFSVbLtoAx0D+gReKtyBTliGYAUPeCrSsFpdj9OFfuUgaE2jrfR0QlgeE 0IWxXjQB/yOe+LX6eZ7KGFpP++wcy0hHtbp1AzKEmCMAzyMQAfzjJtfI7TQXwgaL 5hN7/HtFi00s98KfNAxSOn2OmN1+LBCAgnZ1ZTyW/Pm+Dap/mHlrAUh6C0dh9veT GLsuwRn6NNT0T5fxULwlOF7F0BFAcTo5IhwBdBPoebWVO7GBCdodng6XCBIN9RoP /c6rwtR5HGXMYysHLL8/b5ZGEIdf8rPoof1nyhP60jcTPnD64La9i22pFTkPn1xc SZ4RA/2MeSCXJW7MpEVl/0jbtL04Q+W/QmK0xFfr98FFyTmkEKTKODYAB3HZAl4K JUfNdzIufSk7cyjWnzmkEdgJ/EN/RzgIpva1p/3+/E8+QsUnsbXGNc7w15mYdThk R03S2ZWCpHHq3L1PNUKBgJ5PLoIqTWRh8NavFeEAJ2OjkUIZ/3TqO/onDH/6RwSS LDSlpuHhXFWDzPyPqhuLyRtVgPNSxdYa8yFQftxxWVCh+OGIdmvkYFdYzxvNLwuo iYucShuhSjyJ8VtTn6q/H+inXhDFQIe8tC70wfARe0y1H5ef3lreafGSJ/PGIqBP mj9t02kGtxQuCwadqWw0Ywq8HnqkE5AZdzJ8DlHFDJ8=;
X-AuditID: a2962c47-fbdff7000001abb1-81-5c85b92142e7
Received: from COPDCEXC35.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.114.156.147]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 82.78.43953.129B58C5; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:25:53 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) by COPDCEXC35.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:25:54 -0400
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:25:54 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
CC: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator
Thread-Index: AQHU1vHKZEEzA1Fq+0maaOBX0/6/hKYEw/iAgADg4IA=
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 01:25:54 +0000
Message-ID: <FCA55D75-08BA-419A-8089-A4C986C21770@cable.comcast.com>
References: <155218771419.28706.1428072426137578566.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FACB852B-4BC4-4234-A728-9068708EFB10@rfc1035.com> <20190310080101.GA11452@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190310080101.GA11452@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.16.1.190220
x-originating-ip: [96.114.156.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BFDF5971DE75654384BBBA115986DCD4@comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrAKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsq7iztYYg3nnBC0mLHzJaHHt7kU2 i3PPEhyYPZYs+cnkMfHfBiaP01dfMQcwRzUw2pRkFKUmlrikpqXmFafacSlgAJuk1LT8olTX xKKcyqDUnNRE7MpAKlNSczLLUov0sRqjj9WchC6mjHOXrAvecVTsONXB2MB4gaOLkZNDQsBE YsbN/cxdjFwcQgK7mCR2bD3HAuG0MEmsuHaVFcI5zShxb/9KNpAWNgEzibsLrzCD2CIC7hIL Vu1jAbGZBSQlHh0/xA5iCwsYSxzeeZsdosZEYuO26WwQtpXEl31bwHpZBFQl2vYtYwKxeQVc JFruXmIEsYUEtjFKTNhjAWJzCthJHDr7ECzOKCAm8f3UGiaIXeISt57MZ4J4QUBiyZ7zzBC2 qMTLx/9YQWxRAX2JLX0PWCDiChLv/50CuoEDqFdTYv0ufYgxVhINa48zQ9iKElO6H7JDnCMo cXLmE6hWcYnDR3awTmCUnIVk8yyESbOQTJqFZNIsJJMWMLKuYuQ1NDPSMzQ10DMx0TM33MQI TEeLpum472D8cD72EKMAB6MSD2/9jtYYIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK891YBhXhTEiurUovy44tK c1KLDzFKc7AoifMKbQZKCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUaGFXEXppveHozOKb/wPuuzxrSqrWP VMM3Lr/SXmzI7l7p53bsnZoaV2PVg6DyeUYnSsTm37B2XCf22I/hxn7vwBVdBmwlkxta//VW 8PnMlLQ2PflIb5+3sUzJMo4vqvpzg3/JrUgunlFTvKCyo0Z05q8F55XOS5mH68fOUX5xOzmO JUn/x/udSizFGYmGWsxFxYkA8G07rUMDAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/SsT5UDQe8cD7yEiJ-bPb54XwsFs>
Subject: Re: [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 01:25:58 -0000

On 3/10/19, 4:02 AM, "Doh on behalf of Stephane Bortzmeyer" <doh-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
    
>    I'm surprised that it is published more or less at the same time
    draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues. They have a lot of
    overlap, and even one author in common. May be a merge would be a good
    idea?

[JL] Perhaps so. Time was short before the cutoff and I think we wanted to get some thoughts out there for comment. 
    
    > The specific issue mentioned  above is exactly the same whether I use DoH or DNS-over-UDP to 8.8.8.8
    or 9.9.9.9.

[JL] I think a slight difference is that with public DNS services, the uptake occurs gradually as each individual user makes an explicit choice. This isn't the case should large apps enable DoH.