IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Support requirements for Head

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sun, 18 March 2018 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5B9127275 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4EELFA_ue_40 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [92.243.4.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42580126C25 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 990ADA05CF; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:36:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9ACDCEC0B87; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:35:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:35:22 +0000
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>, doh@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180318163522.GA6724@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <CAN6NTqzkUeF79y=heQ7PK7T3mQVDDk5WRtqB-npi6PuQ2s5bNQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180318131139.GA1127@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803181424120.24786@tvnag.unkk.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803181424120.24786@tvnag.unkk.fr>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/T09foLumE1boPYheE2RH6ZBRjtE>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Support requirements for Head
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:36:59 -0000

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 02:30:34PM +0100,
 Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> wrote 
 a message of 17 lines which said:

> the web is already populated with lots of servers that don't respond
> to HEAD while responding fine to GET.

"The Web is large, and full of errors" (the red priestess, in Game of
Thrones).

Seriously, I know that no RFC will make errors and bugs disappear but
we can at least express a preference?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email