Re: [Doh] Web Convergence - is there a document/RFC for this apparent direction?

Hi Dave,

This is simply a poor choice of words on my part. I see DoH as a new
standard that leverages the DNS binary protocol in the message area. I used
the term "re-standardization" to mean a new standard that redefines and the
way an older one worked. Most significantly, DNS uses another port for
example, but DoH would use port 80/443.

So "redefine" is probably better, but "new standard" is probably the best,
because it isn't directly superceding - the two standards will live on side
by side.

Also, "recasting" is another idea I had with respect to DoH. A lot of the
same "material" is used, but in another form.

Thanks,

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 13:58, Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> wrote:

> Todd Hubers writes:
> > Is there a document/RFC about the IETFs collective general movement
> > toward re-standardisation of things like DNS (DOH), SMTP (JMAP), and
> > maybe others using Web/HTTP/JSON?
>
> I'm curious about the use of the term "re-standardization" here, and
> suspect my interpretation of it is different than what you intended.
> I would take the word to mean redefinition, and in that light I'd have
> a really hard time defining DoH as the DNS being re-standardized.  How
> did you mean it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>

-- 
--
Todd Hubers