Re: [Doh] Working Group Session Agenda @ Prague

[Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:46 AM Jim Reid <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>
> > On 14 Mar 2019, at 15:36, Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Given the extraordinary amount of discussion there has already been
> on-list, it's hard to imagine how we could possibly resolve these in 10
> minutes each.
>
> True. That’s why I suggested having focused discussions about them on the
> list. The discussions to date have gone off at a tangent (or two).
>
> Here’s what I suggested earlier today:
>
> I think the questions to resolve at the WG are:
>
> 1) Are the issues identified in
> draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues valid/reasonable and does
> the WG want to work on them?
> 2) Are the issues identified in draft-reid-doh-operator valid/reasonable
> and does the WG want to work on them?
>
> And if the answers to q1 or q2 are no, the followup question would be:
>         what, if anything, needs to be done to the draft(s) to make them
> WG compatible?
>
>
> I hope the WG can concentrate on these questions in the run-up to Prague.
>

That seems.... optimistic... but in any case, that still calls into
question why we need 20 min of presentation time followed by effectively no
time for discussion.

-Ekr