IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [Ext] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-13: (with COMMENT)

"Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics" <ietf@bartschnet.de> Thu, 16 August 2018 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bartschnet.de>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152E51277CC for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=bartschnet.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3IX8EVc50SWW for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.core-networks.de (mail.core-networks.de [IPv6:2001:1bc0:d::4:9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A5B130EF5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bartschnet.de; s=2018030201; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:To:Subject:content-disposition; bh=X5swEYz02CPnjgnMQ+yqdUOro3T3Fg1DeZTqjOEDr94=; b=KmBgmOpUNTrftjWQ1PWBqln/9X p3YGPnSsIqWsdjgyQOV3k2yHk1PC7LcB3jmECwAQcQY3iQIRiEk+s4NkBLuoscRrdivxAEI60fY/b eFtNmnazeGLFw5wcFSFyD3T4lhscPuY5V3PYv29AmYOa5Yqn5fINs0an5pvnwLh+5AsqWU5idFwJP s/1aPdjyemu6HsozHa8OrVH9RUusCSWBKzTZI+skQd/22l3EXFnmPYVjPgkwCTR7cRJuGkqkaCS0n oALGeFFC0bk8aNEbAfKqDRBxx909QDFnBP4bmtQuv3nSyYzwxHbVDQ2cO60DLkBK6GunL5bZSOiGv uAD+qkmZaADrbAzff6M5h+ZObRektQRzgvU6lzxvg7fwianBNcrXq0k6NfWQapRy+ojD6/fiZsxyV zafz894yvFtMHc32x6Mokd+oitQUGe0C1kpxd3HyZZxkwSNJ13VfCd4+7/iER6QmwsmQR7m2pvm9O sbxhL/f12AAfTZPavKqr2hgvOzjDkfCjkCKuEex+UYqaaKIMkUjHJQVLtYNByurJrToaNUBhUpC9A gXLcPC1+HVmwXu+2yt0Bw4cl1eC7NIjCNmwid/yHRn2rFFPpwgauXK1sk6QcT8OD5ty1RqUxVLRiH oD4xwuFf73JxgZ/8YuhlmIQqnswt3RNm7Chtl62qE=;
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.core-networks.de id 1fqCTw-0008QU-4v with ESMTPSA (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) for doh@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:14:09 +0200
To: doh@ietf.org
References: <153435028609.14458.3744003304771066071.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <041E52A4-E854-4D06-A25D-5C50762DCFCF@icann.org> <CAHw9_iLFTgZTXLhfaxJLQNY8N0+5qgLktP6SQzS9ENnob-Kuvw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics" <ietf@bartschnet.de>
Message-ID: <fdadaeed-0509-10f0-be09-7bbd028774d0@bartschnet.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:14:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLFTgZTXLhfaxJLQNY8N0+5qgLktP6SQzS9ENnob-Kuvw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/UP6fbGNv0LvTCBpDN3kck1V2G_4>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:14:16 -0000

Am 15.08.2018 um 18:54 schrieb Warren Kumari:
>      > General:
>      > You *might* want RFC 8446 instead of 5077, 5246, but I'm not sure.
> 
>     Yes, definitely.
> 
>     --Paul Hoffman
> 

I recommend to use "RFC 8446", too.

Renne

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email