IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] panel discussion on DoH/DoC

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886DA126DBF for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:04:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bcsss5nlCdjp for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:04:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF14124BE5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:04:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id m9so6502018qkl.4 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:04:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=4kdN2WLmuIcyHLVBPI2HQtJw2uZVXAdsJMNpXNjHZD0=; b=BvDSKbXN1SeLD0a0zpwz760K+HMCVMrIOL07xG8zXXGYAKS9icdC3LzICWDinCddvc OJm3/inpX+O9yajufhhga/KF7InM3nME/tg+3sZmJhVFD0sBW7TlFygpQF9TvttZ5UvO 1kxrmg9bV82u3kDGuQjpftL8sq1Ua+sZ65yyqIuf2KikBglNYx9aMn551ZDid2Wpjo20 5CVMVuq4EM+JlseAUOBRPlH6bhIbEgiMiThbrliHbHszdEOsQjjNM+Euw14m9bs0mBOb i3FEICtRqvLnbn/d2qSGGt2lrNsvfU1OzFxJmRgfPp6XzuMRx836N4YsxmzG28wr5fkz Fw8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=4kdN2WLmuIcyHLVBPI2HQtJw2uZVXAdsJMNpXNjHZD0=; b=HdccS8ahyS2/0gJ/zkoQXt5MhcLtqzDA1Lj1v/ja4ONqz9KHIDZACUfIvsgtNSQpUZ tImJk2xjad3aMn1Yw6H4QF6ifHBiG2oJtgNBcIQb5mIuoPxO6FqwErxkq1MDJmpr8LxO ua+M3lJ3FOqHfYNxf47SvuTAxbgRrMVFh/UbIWZLevePih2azXsD5EU5hFGmNapp6f2g udx6uUfkBj4TYBLAo+G/rDU9TUiyNkkC6gyHj/ok9SzuUUDgwbErkPsqZBlth71dfP/E jMdhgyiG8XthDKVnSQUILTe3LdRqqZVRpRufBs28d0hXRjrFoMALN+roUO9M1u34DAT/ YpMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZTYqBMUc6rj57zo6zFyJP6NHqhNUx4EM24V4N3tPQIw1a+s8mH OkDLScJ/hhAMw6BwftZ6zMwnxg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IY3KTYwBrKQHIGQepWAv3BY2kgGPqJLNx/jP/hLWOpOzer0Rw7UcewVDOU51zUlHk+OjmzAAQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:ea02:: with SMTP id f2mr9390052qkg.178.1549548262823; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.34] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13sm2521340qtv.78.2019.02.07.06.04.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2019 06:04:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <35CBC108-69C9-4EB9-AACE-EEB39F802456@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EB3927E9-B8F0-47C0-BCF5-0FC76BDFAA37"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:04:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <637C85D5-EACC-4C39-A220-753AC83FD78A@rfc1035.com>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, doh@ietf.org, bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
References: <20190207105106.GB1772@server.ds9a.nl> <C7C3BAF7-4BD4-4EE2-B3F2-1F8B49222980@fugue.com> <20190207130313.7g7hf4swaopnr75e@nic.fr> <FD7BFAFF-88B9-49BF-A652-3649ADCD53F9@fugue.com> <637C85D5-EACC-4C39-A220-753AC83FD78A@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/XqlaIfvL6EZYQFnB21esKPkIE5Y>
Subject: Re: [Doh] panel discussion on DoH/DoC
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 14:04:26 -0000

On Feb 7, 2019, at 8:51 AM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> These sorts of meta-issues need to be documented and I think this WG might be the best place to do that.

Doh?   Why not DPRIVE or DNSOP?

I agree that we should talk about this; not sure DoH is the right place to have the conversation though.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email