Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Mon, 22 July 2019 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC38120338 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mByYEGXSEOL5 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [162.150.44.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D600F12033D for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=comcast.com; s=20190412; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@comcast.com; t=1563813705; x=2427727305; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=drixkcZtrbubfprxlM48dAw+8UpCYqQmWTDXVt4vrpE=; b=aQhwkWzgR7E/HB8UvEIoWXnEOVNyndp8uyirYelpwE6vTGc2CBs9w+mbG8pOiFAa yEVkvHjd3f4eNrsdNAVA/WHdx5D5dQdLYYvhIE5naXUZqMosHHbVzVkj0r+WcOAk amt7Bc9KOtJoK45v1t7H/YlKKt3w0Vxfl4GOYNA2ZAXPvFe0I3XHoLnmpnEuTbT8 mOtKhTlB0oN0EpKAEQMU22c1uRamAxLLaTmDgXnFj468Hdv0dmvSm6g74NAb32Q8 ln6ki7TOz7N/d+xCpfUZPREnJ/xV1fBdTjrVI9wVQ5JNhpvpadB+hn67wrbbMhRQ NDoKM29QGHwt4WbSfpZACg==;
X-AuditID: a2962c47-ab9ff7000002e144-05-5d35e7496d5c
Received: from COPDCEXC38.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.114.156.147]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 1A.DD.57668.947E53D5; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:41:45 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) by COPDCEXC38.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:41:58 -0400
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.008; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:41:58 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Puneet Sood <puneets=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Kevin Borgolte <kevin@iseclab.org>
CC: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, "add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>, "pschmitt@cs.princeton.edu" <pschmitt@cs.princeton.edu>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, "feamster@uchicago.edu" <feamster@uchicago.edu>, "jordanah@princeton.edu" <jordanah@princeton.edu>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, "ahounsel@cs.princeton.edu" <ahounsel@cs.princeton.edu>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW
Thread-Index: AQHVQAKpiwWiGVXJY0iQLg/SQuIMEqbWwjGA
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:41:57 +0000
Message-ID: <5F9202DE-ED2F-4F2A-8463-12334E54BC46@cable.comcast.com>
References: <402781F4-33D8-4FD4-8087-FDCEFFF2D549@iseclab.org> <CAChr6SwBKOymQjKsN+GEnygn5ogJb6WUMd=jxRrV2eQWwdiBcg@mail.gmail.com> <267CBE74-9DC5-40D8-A61F-7C566644A1CB@iseclab.org> <CA+9_gVsKKOtiu6EXK+mrF_kkva-cORLuU2p3zijbPUvSVF5K5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9_gVsKKOtiu6EXK+mrF_kkva-cORLuU2p3zijbPUvSVF5K5g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1b.0.190715
x-originating-ip: [68.87.29.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0938F540FC185941B33EB4EDF2E99508@comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsq7nc9NYg+Ov+Sz+n17HZtHw7j6b xYbWHawWd99cZrG4dvcim8WiU0cYLS7O47Q4vfs8u8Xa+4wWL44mW3TOmsDkwO3R97iT1ePE siusHjtn3WX3WLLkJ5PH/jVvWD1a/25g8VjTkhDAHtXAaFOSUZSaWOKSmpaaV5xqx6WAAWyS UtPyi1JdE4tyKoNSc1ITsSsDqUxJzcksSy3Sx2qMPlZzErqYMv4/6WYsuMFVsf3YHNYGxi1c XYwcHBICJhLPD3N3MXJxCAkcYZLYOHkCE4TTwiTxcd57RgjnNKPE+Y9HgRxODjYBM4m7C68w g9giAtESPX3nmEGKmAUamCWWHJoPlhAGSrSv/MsIURQjcejMTiYI20jixpy5bCA2i4CqxO2t 11hBbF4BF4kZy/4zQ2xrZJKY+7IXrIhTIFBi+4aFYEMZBcQkvp9aAzaIWUBc4taT+WC2hICA xJI955khbFGJl4//gQ0VFdCX+HJuEwtEXE6iZ0crI8jPzAKaEut36UOMsZK4cvISM4StKDGl +yE7xD2CEidnPoFqFZc4fGQH6wRGyVlINs9CmDQLyaRZSCbNQjJpASPrKkZeQzMjPUNTAz0T Ez1zw02MwCS4aJqO+w7GD+djDzEKcDAq8fDGXTaNFWJNLCuuzD3EKMHBrCTCm2cAFOJNSays Si3Kjy8qzUktPsQozcGiJM57eLJGrJBAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoFRVCv2/p66OusVCkzb K7Yd3iO3kT3nxYmX+1oOz2TkvWL6h+HN4pD3s42NA392h12Kf+OlU/hC8Ljn170WPgZMl0ri i55zaFWlPrH9K9vuFTirzlnK3Tdvz7tgZ64tWX0T/gRLS9puq17xpULedI70gvLZLycXXZ2o khZqUy52ffmfzT/ctixTYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAmRhp4n4DAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/Yb_V5oLjn3r8ZG3JYKPNv-uckbU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:25:13 -0700
Subject: Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:42:06 -0000

On 7/21/19, 4:27 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of Puneet Sood":
> Running the experiment from locations which are further away from cloud providers would provide another interesting set of data.

[JL] +1. I understand the US FCC is considering running DoH tests from their Measuring Broadband America end points around the US. Those devices are managed by SamKnows, which just announced they added a DoH test to their suite of measurements. 

> Conclusion on benefit (or lack) of ECS. Did the page load measurements include content that would benefit from proximity to the end user, e.g. streaming videos or large downloads? This kind of content benefits from ECS when the resolver is further away from the client.

[JL] I wonder if it might be useful for CDNs to publish some measurement test URLs that are highly localized (e.g. distributed widely & as close as possible to users). That might enable better testing of performance for accessing content that benefits from proximity to users.