Re: [Doh] [Ext] DNS Camel thoughts: TC and message size

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 07:19 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5F8130E8C for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 00:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LYdWQNM6HmsD for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 00:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (linode6only.ducksong.com [IPv6:2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe6e:e8da]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD38130E7E for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 00:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-f175.google.com (mail-ot0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 379183A042 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 03:19:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-f175.google.com with SMTP id n3-v6so10349769ota.5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1LsZY1z1xzOTdKk7MQL6rVNdxKBvH0rm5D3a853DvjiMiq1rTw LpPc/tkGopLbOJ13a7YjKF9KDMCkabEGGg/zGZw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLrn5sFjDkNPI/0aeglOsSu5aN5dKrfwfNWxcfAdC+KN+0+WFR0efzdnQS/61Uhs0Nru1uD7Fh+o0Hxr0MSoz8=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2c41:: with SMTP id f59-v6mr322813otb.263.1528355946900; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:8a32:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 00:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F5774061-35B9-477F-ADDA-8BB3472F30EF@icann.org>
References: <20180606093212.GA23880@server.ds9a.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806061501340.10764@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <F5774061-35B9-477F-ADDA-8BB3472F30EF@icann.org>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:19:06 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNq9g3ghbg9fkfhP+ZA4-6E5oDNFCGo6NN9bydqUX76cLA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNq9g3ghbg9fkfhP+ZA4-6E5oDNFCGo6NN9bydqUX76cLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004e3473056e081946"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/Ytb9nU0BKDGOdcq0CT3hLt4_KGM>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] DNS Camel thoughts: TC and message size
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:19:12 -0000

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:42 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>;
wrote:

> I hear a lot of support for Bert's wording:
>    Specify that DNS messages carried over
>    DOH can be up to 65536 bytes large and note that truncation should be
>    handled as if the response was carried over TCP/53.
>
> This thread has brought up a significant concern that I hope those
> supporting the language can clear up.
>
>
it seems possible that this is a property of the default media type not of
DoH. e.g. a negotiated json response wouldn't have this kind of limitation.
Does that make sense?