IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] New Privacy Considerations Section Proposal

Loganaden Velvindron <logan@hackers.mu> Thu, 28 June 2018 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <logan@hackers.mu>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523E5130E7A for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hackers-mu.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hAhtniSF8Wg9 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x234.google.com (mail-ot0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D0E130E25 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b10-v6so2968350otl.10 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hackers-mu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sL90YGtaNTODucSqhpWbEcBpHKF4XejhQo0KMKMIxJg=; b=FRtrxMZwQTECNTuhHpgkiTmZGCUreRaivbWBuA+6clIRDBPbQnqjW5TbpsFmUDmwDM RbkcCniPRv5zk8y4iE0WffyYRoxCUjR0XFOokUe2qR2J0hu+K+tkYznJkfG5gIBbwmi1 KsOj94ci7Jip4sYfnaYOt960OkDn/p93XdiE83kLuSwq1HAoWgQ853/guWSyGhZVwKIp CgqE1BweimtfHk6g3YQuDhjF0kmhmmdUYodSp4gXs1/tUbJ5sppO4rPTMHFeYuLKGFz0 DoUkVgrwN9mjCE1wTZRF3shvcZtuhjtkwZ9fKRgwT8YvDKdsSy3TkDIcrYFFWUsbZyWN wvSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sL90YGtaNTODucSqhpWbEcBpHKF4XejhQo0KMKMIxJg=; b=MNSZdD0D/AA+C7jG6RiU46beA2//2Y0vb8lsVtAivdoB2r5oRFXQY7mnm299G78e61 cROt3cRoQ7HrgTUaQySiRlugvwuZQYKY2o5pgLTKakKocARPniFS98/rSSJxiqeNw951 llDt02fH4Yw78W/JfQ772r5vKKwb7jtgIAJw4PxmBU7li8eOigyky/C+t3928RjoUE2T WGk5PvGCZLWY9/KYCLgP9Hh5Fo/IAonAefV5qNC1trNUmZ0mvXFTYfAGucuvz8fE2rjX hvMJkw5WYtOVv6b1bqgaffdWB4HWN5tVSlG0Ua57aEQBBOrnK9WLIBqzNTZMvW67gekm zvzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3/RLWI9RhKpsXqaR0OEKsWJeMbAyR2B8CNGIpbBLyXYuRM7C/N y5EVjYzgSKzqbRHj8d3/4KmFiwWSH5802TlvfSk7g0f8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcnlLH/0DjcpT/48GOBEsZvkmumb5xr42Z42RQEnV4aqdbnBhaEjjAJEBCJ75BOzLyrS46f/4w6XN7Tkc8JcKc=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1a0e:: with SMTP id a14-v6mr5723286ote.314.1530167877597; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:ad8f:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNpY4NpvSKW_D__jztDD_wkaRsJna9L+Br+hdnDnQ8w5SQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNpY4NpvSKW_D__jztDD_wkaRsJna9L+Br+hdnDnQ8w5SQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <logan@hackers.mu>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:37:56 +0400
Message-ID: <CAFDEUTevGcu4hzvQs+SqiRhhYVXL=fk3OGydV1HBKP4YZZsTLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/_QsrpDnkuKs4-BFrN7bKBfrpWTk>
Subject: Re: [Doh] New Privacy Considerations Section Proposal
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 06:38:01 -0000

There is the mention of padding which was added in the security
section. RFC 7830 talks about padding but does not mention padding
length. I've made a PR here for pointing to
draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy which discusses padding length
choices: https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/207.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email