Re: [Doh] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8484 (6033)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Tue, 31 March 2020 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863C73A224F for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zrwA1kFLRMMu for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463A03A224E for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PFE112-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 02VElq5W000678 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:47:53 GMT
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:47:51 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:47:51 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
CC: "doh@ietf.org" <doh@ietf.org>, David Lawrence <tale@dd.org>, Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "RFC Editor" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [Doh] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8484 (6033)
Thread-Index: AQHWBrgKy0P/LLB+1UCQ4d22YzaIgqhi3lyAgABgPwA=
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:47:50 +0000
Message-ID: <3BC73714-9E1C-43E1-A76D-F0919C3EA22F@icann.org>
References: <20200330155304.45AD8F4074B@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJJ3dAEebgyz==PoSqnhSzFiHcxh0kmynRYBcD6Vjvm+6w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJK-FNqt-uHOz6oqANj8Xpwt7BOQkO6Ut-iAZ_OY-arO5Q@mail.gmail.com> <8FCCBEAC-F86C-4454-BC8A-3E637539BBEB@icann.org> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031489622@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031489622@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_340A68E7-12AC-4D20-9ABC-398DC75AF884"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-31_04:2020-03-31, 2020-03-31 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/_SSYjgCyJNjLwT5stg1b1Chq4Tw>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8484 (6033)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:48:01 -0000

On Mar 31, 2020, at 2:03 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> I'm now more puzzled about the intent of the document with regards to redirection:

That's fine, and you are not alone. But the proper resolution of that puzzlement is not an erratum, it is a document update.

--Paul Hoffman