Re: [Doh] Clarification for a newbie DoH implementor

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Mon, 20 May 2019 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4D012012D for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 01:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=portfast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K4JM0YfEwj7Y for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 01:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.portfast.net (mail.portfast.net [IPv6:2a03:9800:20:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 254F4120077 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2019 01:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=portfast.net; s=dkim; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=O756vT44kfeKVt6RVVPqCzERYZTNV/cug/8QD1dv9oo=; b=QSKkVHt/uF3q7uttkIzepTUkkG /ZTdeCX29+9Y3YSWTXBVEgpGBcpvKg60OfyDRHDckgLE7E9BYmPwTlgWzOtfsGiaUiPe2QyGujX1I CIPIawVu6wQmRwu+54Tx7XYqnyMC81lnr2V8KoKsfSa/4qlQZco1HgzpygnwGgASNJ78=;
Received: from [88.212.170.147] (port=49482 helo=Rays-MacBook-Pro.local) by mail.portfast.net ([188.246.200.9]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1hSdP1-0003bi-7g (Exim 4.89) for doh@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Mon, 20 May 2019 08:12:11 +0000
To: doh@ietf.org
References: <20190418071238.68406.qmail@f3-external.bushwire.net> <20190518233815.44249.qmail@f3-external.bushwire.net> <CAHbrMsCMWtzHXZvpodak59RtAkSQC_ZM03oekKj00WqzNkDaaA@mail.gmail.com> <20190519055255.45717.qmail@f3-external.bushwire.net> <CAHbrMsC-1OQnoaYFE5BO8UzDsebo7jhJBfc9F4J-zgeA2FZm7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <d7d051f8-35fb-e06e-8baa-24f1aaa50b61@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 09:12:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsC-1OQnoaYFE5BO8UzDsebo7jhJBfc9F4J-zgeA2FZm7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/_qZOGRdSMU8C-xNXLuYdzbxCy1c>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Clarification for a newbie DoH implementor
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 08:12:16 -0000


On 19/05/2019 16:41, Ben Schwartz wrote:

> The classic DNS protocol doesn't have any such role indications either.  
> Thus, when I send a query to my network's advertised DNS server, I have 
> no idea whether it is acting as a recursive, forwarding my query to a 
> recursive (e.g. dnsmasq), or something in-between.  This is transparent 
> and generally does not cause problems.

Not so - see RFC 5625 and SSAC035.

Ray