Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

Raymond Burkholder <ray@oneunified.net> Wed, 13 March 2019 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@oneunified.net>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD5312788C; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fF2NNrjzZveP; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.oneunified.net (mail1.oneunified.net [63.85.42.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD981277DB; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-One-Unified-MailScanner-Watermark: 1553051487.829@re6lKkH95ufVYuTn2mmLUQ
X-One-Unified-MailScanner-From: ray@oneunified.net
X-One-Unified-MailScanner: Not scanned: postmaster@oneunified.net
X-One-Unified-MailScanner-ID: x2D3BPRL015322
X-OneUnified-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from [10.55.40.139] (h96-45-2-121-eidnet.org.2.45.96.in-addr.arpa [96.45.2.121] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.oneunified.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id x2D3BPRL015322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 03:11:27 GMT
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, "doh@ietf.org" <doh@ietf.org>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
References: <1700920918.12557.1552229700654@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <1709670.IeiIJmgblr@linux-9daj> <b7bbc027-1195-8c50-9921-77baa87f9160@huitema.net> <5342244.Q90AZAhhXk@linux-9daj>
From: Raymond Burkholder <ray@oneunified.net>
Organization: One Unified Net Limited
Message-ID: <3846722d-ef8a-074c-ff08-f9e9c19e0939@oneunified.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:11:25 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5342244.Q90AZAhhXk@linux-9daj>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/bs611eryl7bch_jgQiva0VbVEXE>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 03:11:35 -0000

On 2019-03-12 2:51 p.m., Paul Vixie wrote:
> ...  development of protocols whose ideal state is "interoperability"
> and never more or less.

slightly out of context, but I find the 'interoperability' context as an 
underlying definition worthy of support.